Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
3 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Kligerman |
16 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alice Sigurdson |
18 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rupa Doppalapudi |
23 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Radim Sram |
18 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - James Tucker |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
18 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
19 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alice Sigurdson |
20 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Kligerman |
21 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rupa Doppalapudi |
5 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Radim Sram |
16 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - James Tucker |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
23 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - James Tucker |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
23 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
3 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - James Tucker |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
3 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
10 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-10-16 |
You can find further information about peer review here.