Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Urinary bisphenol A concentrations in girls from rural and urban Egypt: a pilot study

  • Muna S Nahar1,
  • Amr S Soliman2, 3,
  • Justin A Colacino1, 3,
  • Antonia M Calafat4,
  • Kristen Battige1,
  • Ahmed Hablas5,
  • Ibrahim A Seifeldin5,
  • Dana C Dolinoy1Email author and
  • Laura S Rozek1, 3, 6
Contributed equally
Environmental Health201211:20

DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-20

Received: 15 December 2011

Accepted: 2 April 2012

Published: 2 April 2012

Abstract

Background

Exposure to endocrine active compounds, including bisphenol A (BPA), remains poorly characterized in developing countries despite the fact that behavioral practices related to westernization have the potential to influence exposure. BPA is a high production volume chemical that has been associated with metabolic dysfunction as well as behavioral and developmental effects in people, including children. In this pilot study, we evaluate BPA exposure and assess likely pathways of exposure among girls from urban and rural Egypt.

Methods

We measured urinary concentrations of total (free plus conjugated) species of BPA in spot samples in urban (N = 30) and rural (N = 30) Egyptian girls, and compared these concentrations to preexisting data from age-matched American girls (N = 47) from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We also collected anthropometric and questionnaire data regarding food storage behaviors to assess potential routes of exposure.

Results

Urban and rural Egyptian girls exhibited similar concentrations of urinary total BPA, with median unadjusted values of 1.00 and 0.60 ng/mL, respectively. Concentrations of urinary BPA in this group of Egyptian girls (median unadjusted: 0.70 ng/mL) were significantly lower compared to age-matched American girls (median unadjusted: 2.60 ng/mL) according to NHANES 2009-2010 data. Reported storage of food in plastic containers was a significant predictor of increasing concentrations of urinary BPA.

Conclusions

Despite the relatively low urinary BPA concentrations within this Egyptian cohort, the significant association between food storage behaviors and increasing urinary BPA concentration highlights the need to understand food and consumer product patterns that may be closing the gap between urban and rural lifestyles.

Keywords

Egypt Urban Rural Bisphenol A

Background

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a monomer used in epoxy resins and polycarbonate plastic production. BPA is one of the highest volume chemicals with worldwide annual production of more than 8 billion pounds [1]. BPA continues to play a fundamental role in the plastics industry, given that BPA-based plastic materials have a variety of desirable properties including transparency, high impact strength, malleability, and superior adhesive properties [2]. BPA-based materials have a broad range of applications and are found in many commonly used products such as water bottles, dental sealants, medical equipment, epoxy resin linings in food and beverage cans, and thermal paper. Exposure is nearly ubiquitous in the general U.S. population, with over 92% of individuals sampled in the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) having detectable BPA levels in their urine [3]. BPA has the ability to leach from consumer products such as baby bottles, water bottles, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing, and plastic containers, creating many opportunities for exposure [48]. Diet is an important route of BPA exposure due to its leaching from food and beverage containers [911]. Other important routes of exposures include inhalation from aerosolized BPA and dermal uptake from contact with thermal paper, medical or dental supplies [1215].

There has been growing interest in BPA exposure given its presence and use in both developed and developing countries, as well as the health implications associated with its ability to mimic endogenous estrogen. BPA has a lower binding affinity, interacting with the α and β estrogen receptors (ER) at 104 times lower potency compared to estradiol [16]. However, BPA has been shown to stimulate rapid cellular responses at concentrations much lower than anticipated, potentially due to high binding affinities for G-protein coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) and estrogen related receptor gamma (ERRγ) as seen in human studies [17, 18]. BPA also antagonizes thyroid hormone and androgen function [16]. Both estrogenic and nonestrogenic effects from exposures to BPA in vivo and in vitro have been linked to changes in gene expression and cell proliferation in a variety of cells, tissues, and organs including the mammary glands and prostate [19, 20]. Studies suggest that environmental exposure to BPA is associated with behavioral and reproductive abnormalities, as well as chronic diseases, especially when exposures occur during critical windows of development [2125].

Exposure to endocrine disruptors varies within populations based on age, race, and sociodemographic factors [3, 26]. Epidemiological studies conducted in Egypt also report geographical variance in disease incidence, highlighting the importance in evaluating the contribution of environmental exposures to these trends [2729]. Developing countries, where there are major discrepancies in social and behavioral practices between urban and rural populations, offer a unique setting in which to study potential toxicant-disease interactions. Therefore, it is important to understand environmental exposure profiles in vulnerable populations, especially in developing countries where exposures remain largely uncharacterized. In this pilot study, we determined urinary concentrations of BPA in 60 premenstrual girls from urban and rural Egypt. BPA concentrations within the Egyptian cohort were compared to an age- and sex-matched United States population from NHANES 2009-2010. In addition, we investigated possible associations between urinary BPA concentrations and residential status, anthropometric measurements, and questionnaire data to assess potential sources of exposure.

Methods

Subject selection

In 2009, we recruited healthy females between the ages of 10-13 years living in either rural (N = 30) or urban (N = 30) areas of the Gharbiah province of Egypt, located 90 kilometers north of Cairo. Approximately 30% of Gharbiah's population resides in urban areas, with Tanta serving as the capital of all eight districts within the region. To determine rural versus urban status, participants were assigned a residence code based on their residential address that followed the Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS) national census coding of urban and rural areas [22]. To recruit urban subjects, we utilized a systematic random sampling of census records from Tanta. Rural subjects were recruited via systematic random sampling from two villages in two separate districts in the province. No refusals were encountered when selected subjects were approached in local primary schools to participate. All study participants were provided bus transportation to and from the Tanta Cancer Center and were not restricted from food and water access. Mothers of participants gave informed consent prior to sample collection. Approval from the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Michigan and the Gharbiah Cancer Society were obtained before starting the study. The involvement of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) laboratory was determined not to constitute engagement in human subject research.

Urine sample collection and questionnaire

Participants provided one spot urine sample, completed an administered questionnaire in Arabic, and were measured for height, weight, waist, and hip circumference. Urine samples from individuals were collected between 12:00 and 4:00 PM in sterile polypropylene containers between July and October 2009. Nine mL of urine were mixed thoroughly, split into two aliquots, and shipped on dry ice to the National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) at the CDC for analysis and the University of Michigan School Of Public Health for archiving. An interviewer administered a lifestyle and diet questionnaire in Arabic in order to assess potential routes of exposure. The questionnaire, entitled "Comparison of Xenoestrogen Levels Among Prepubertal Females in Urban and Rural Gharbiah, Egypt," contained questions addressing residential history, personal care product usage, family history of cancer, use of canned foods, and food preparation and storage behaviors.

Urinary BPA measurements

The Division of Laboratory Sciences of NCEH, CDC determined the urinary concentrations of total (free plus conjugated forms) of BPA. Urine samples from each participant were subject to enzymatic hydrolysis of the conjugated (glucuronide and sulfate) BPA species and then automated cleanup. Total BPA was measured by on-line solid phase extraction coupled with isotope dilution-high performance liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-tandem mass spectrometry following a previously described analytical approach [30]. For quality assessment, in addition to the calibration standards, we analyzed two blanks, two low-concentration quality control (QC) materials (~2 ng/mL with individual measurements: 2.67 and 2.62 ng/mL), and two high-concentration QCs (~9 ng/mL with individual measurements: 9.04 and 9.47 ng/mL), along with the study samples. BPA was undetectable in the two blanks. Similar to measurements taken for NHANES, the limit of detection (LOD) at 0.4 ng/mL was determined using repeated measurements of low-level synthetic urine standards as previously described [30]. CDC personnel received coded specimens and did not have access to any personal, geographic, anthropometric, or questionnaire information from the study subjects.

Statistical analysis

Urinary BPA concentrations below the LOD were assigned a value of 0.28, which was estimated by dividing the LOD by the square root of 2. Both creatinine, measured using a colorimetric assay, and specific gravity, measured by refractometry, were recorded for each participants in the field. Given the high inter-individual variability and subjective assessment of creatinine, we adjusted urinary BPA concentrations for specific gravity (SG), previously used as a reliable alterative to creatinine [31, 32]. Briefly, specific gravity adjusted urinary BPA concentrations were calculated by the formula Pc = P[(1.018 - 1)/(SG-1)], where Pc is the specific gravity adjusted BPA concentration (ng/mL), P is the measured unadjusted urinary BPA concentration, 1.018 is the sample population median specific gravity value, and SG is the measured specific gravity for each urine sample. Samples from three girls had specific gravity levels below 1.005; these samples were excluded from the analyses because they were too dilute, resulting in a final sample size for BPA analysis of N = 57. Age, body mass index (BMI), the use of plastic containers for food storage, and the consumption of canned foods were obtained from the questionnaire and anthropometric measurements. Urban and rural status was assigned as previously described [22]. Univariate statistics, including mean, geometric mean (GM), geometric standard error, median, and range for demographic, anthropometric, and BPA measurements were calculated. Chi-square tests were used to compare food storage behaviors and a t-test was used to compare urinary BPA concentrations between rural and urban girls. Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to assess the association between log-transformed unadjusted urinary BPA concentrations and individual covariates. Both specific gravity adjusted and unadjusted urinary BPA concentrations were reported in the univariate analyses, while log-transformed unadjusted BPA concentrations were used in the bivariate and multiple regression models to correct for departures from normality of the regression residuals. Specific gravity was included as a covariate in the multivariate analysis for each regression model. Age, BMI, and specific gravity were included in the multivariate regression model as continuous biologically relevant variables, while canned food consumption, food storage in plastics, and residential status were included as categorical variables. Canned food use and food storage in plastics were modeled as yes versus no in response to the questions "Do you eat tinned or canned food products?" and "Do you store food in plastic bags, containers, and/or Tupperware?", respectively. Regression coefficients with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant and β values were interpreted by calculating percent change [100(e^β -1)]. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were conducted using the UNIVARIATE and REG procedures in SAS software (version 9.2, SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

We also performed statistical analysis of urinary BPA concentrations from 47 age- and sex-matched NHANES 2009-2010 participants using the SURVEYMEANS procedures in SAS with relevant strata, clusters, domain, and weights taking into account the complex sampling design. NHANES analysis was restricted to girls between the age of 10 and 13, who submitted urine samples during the afternoon session to match the sampling of our Egyptian cohort. A two-sample t-test was used to compare geometric means of urinary BPA measurements from NHANES to urinary BPA concentrations in our Egyptian subjects.

Results

Among the 60 girls recruited, three were excluded from analyses due to urine dilution (specific gravity < 1.005) resulting in a final sample size for analysis of N = 57. Exclusion of these subjects from our analysis did not significantly alter the overall distribution of anthropometric and urinary BPA measurements from this cohort. Anthropometric parameters including BMI, hip circumference, and waist circumference were similar between the 28 urban and 29 rural Egyptian girls in this study (Table 1). Participants' age ranged from 10-13 years with an average age of 11 years for both urban and rural groups. Overall, there were no significant differences in age and anthropometric measurements between the two groups. When we compared anthropometric measurements to age and sex matched NHANES participants, American girls exhibited higher BMI and waist circumference compared to Egyptian girls.
Table 1

Demographic and anthropometric measurements of urban vs. rural Egyptiana girls and Americanb girls

 

Urban Egyptians (N = 28)

Rural Egyptians (N = 29)

NHANES (N = 47)

 

Mean, Median

Min, Max

Mean, Median

Min, Max

Mean, Median

Min, Max

Age (years)

11.4, 11.4

10.1, 13.2

11.6, 11.6

10.1, 13.6

11.3, 11.0

10.0, 13.0

Body Mass Index

(kg/m2)

20.2, 18.6

13.8, 30.2

19.3, 19.1

13.7, 31.2

22.1, 21.3

14.5, 34.2

Hip Circumference (cm)

62.0, 60.6

35.5, 92.0

59.9, 59.3

48.5, 80.0

N/A, N/A

N/A, N/A

Waist Circumference

(cm)

42.9, 42.0

31.0, 62.0

40.4, 40.7

33.0, 56.3

76.6, 74.0

55.2, 111

aDemographic and anthropometric measurements were similar before and after exclusion of 3 girls who provided diluted urine specimens (specific gravity < 1.005; recruited N = 60, analyzed N = 57)

bGirls age 10-13 years from NHANES 2009-2010

Bivariate analyses of food storage behaviors indicate significantly different reports of canned food consumption but similar reports of food storage in plastics between urban and rural girls (p-value = 0.001 and 0.248, respectively). Approximately 25% of girls residing in rural areas compared to 68% of those residing in urban areas reported consuming canned foods, while 69% of rural girls and 82% of urban girls reported storing food in plastic containers (Table 2). In general, 18% of rural girls and 61% of urban girls reported both canned food consumption and food storage in plastics within this population. Specific gravity was significantly lower among urban girls compared to rural girls (p = 0.035; data not shown).
Table 2

Percent of urban vs. rural Egyptian girls who responded "Yes" to food storage behaviors

 

Total (N = 57)

Urban (N = 28)

Rural (N = 29)

p-valueb

Canned Food Usea

46%

68%

25%

0.001*

Food Storage in Plastic

75%

82%

69%

0.248

Canned Food Use + Food Storage in Plastics

39%

61%

18%

0.001*

aOne non-respondent (rural N = 28, total N = 56)

bTwo-sided significance calculated from Pearson chi-squared

*Significance at p-value < 0.05

The majority of girls (90% rural and 68% urban) had detectable urinary BPA concentrations. Among the 57 study participants, both SG-adjusted and unadjusted urinary BPA measurements exhibited a right skewed non-normal distribution. Rural Egyptian girls had a median unadjusted urinary BPA concentration of 0.60 ng/mL (range = <LOD-12.0 ng/mL, GM = 0.89), while urban Egyptian girls had a median unadjusted urinary BPA concentration of 1.00 ng/mL (range = <LOD-6.2 ng/mL, GM = 0.79, p = 0.478, Table 3). After adjustment for specific gravity, median urinary BPA concentrations slightly increased to 1.08 ng/mL in rural girls and 1.02 ng/mL in urban girls (p = 0.578, Table 3). BPA urinary concentrations from an age- and sex-matched subset (N = 47) from NHANES 2009-2010 were significantly higher than Egyptian (N = 57) BPA measurements (GM: 1.96 ng/mL in NHANES, GM = 0.84 ng/mL in Egypt, p < 0.01, Table 3).
Table 3

Total urinary unadjusted and adjusted BPA concentrations (ng/mL) in Egyptian girls compared to Americana girls

BPA

N

% Above LOD

Mean

Median

Min

Max

Geom.Mean (GSEb)

Unadjusted

   All

57

79

1.34

0.70

<LOD

12.0

0.84 (0.10)

   Urban

28

68

1.24

1.00

<LOD

6.20

0.79 (0.14)

   Rural

29

90

1.44

0.60

<LOD

12.0

0.89 (0.89)

   NHANESa

47

98

2.83

2.60

<LOD

16.1

1.96 (0.23)*

Specific Gravity

Adjusted

   All

57

 

1.75

1.02

<LOD

10.8

1.00 (0.14)

   Urban

28

 

2.13

1.02

<LOD

10.8

1.14 (0.25)

   Rural

29

 

1.39

1.08

<LOD

8.64

0.89 (0.16)

aGirls age 10-13 years from NHANES 2009-2010

bGSE = Geometric standard error; LOD = 0.4 ng/mL

* Geometric means significantly differed between NHANES and Egypt cohorts when tested using two sample t-test (p < 0.01)

No significant correlations were observed between unadjusted log-BPA urinary concentrations and individual covariates such as age, BMI, specific gravity, residential status, and canned food consumption (data not shown). However, a significant Pearsons correlation was detected between log-BPA concentrations and food storage in plastic containers (p = 0.041). Furthermore, multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess the strength of association between BPA concentration and our primary predictor, residential status, after adjusting for well-known covariates. In the final model, we adjusted for urban/rural status, canned food consumption, food storage in plastic, specific gravity, age, and BMI (Table 4). The association between urinary BPA concentrations and residential status was not significant after adjusting for biological covariates (β = -0.073 and p = 0.783). Given the significant correlation between food storage in plastic containers and BPA in the bivariate analysis, we assessed the relationship between BPA concentrations and food storage behaviors after adjusting for covariates. Of the two food storage behaviors analyzed (Table 4), storage in plastic containers was a significant predictor of increasing urinary BPA concentration after adjusting for covariates (β = 0.626 and p = 0.036). Adjustment of this model, especially by canned food use, improved the association between urinary BPA and food storage in plastic. Girls who reported storage of food in plastic containers had, on average, 87% higher urinary BPA concentrations compared to girls who did not store food in plastic containers after adjusting for biological covariates, canned food use, and residential status.
Table 4

Residential status, canned foods, and food storage in plastics as potential predictors of (log transformed) urinary BPA concentrations (ng/mL)

 

β

95% CI

p-value

% change

Residential Statusa

-0.072

[-0.577,0.434]

0.777

-6.95%

Residential Statusb

-0.073

[-0.600,0.455]

0.783

-7.04%

Canned Food Usea

0.365

[-0.118,0.848]

0.136

44.05%

Canned Food Useb

0.394

[-0.108,0.895]

0.121

62.42%

Food Storage in Plastica

0.552

[0.007,1.097]

0.047*

73.67%

Food Storage in Plasticb

0.546

[-0.012,1.105]

0.055

72.63%

Food Storage in Plasticc

0.626

[0.043,1.210]

0.036*

87.01%

aAdjusted for specific gravity

bAdjusted for specific gravity, BMI, and age

cAdjusted for all other covariates (specific gravity, BMI, age, residential status, plastic storage, and canned food)

*Significance at p-value < 0.05; predictors were run separately for models a, b, and c

Discussion

Total urinary BPA, including free and conjugated species, was detected at low parts-per-billion levels in premenstrual Egyptian girls, 21% of whom exhibited concentrations below the limit of detection at 0.40 ng/mL. Overall, the Egyptian cohort showed significantly lower urinary BPA concentrations compared to age- and sex-matched American girls from NHANES 2009-2010. Similar ranges of BPA concentrations compared to this Egyptian cohort have been reported in several international cohorts. Recent studies report that the median concentration of urinary BPA in 48 Japanese women was 1.2 ng/mL [33], while the median BPA concentration of 60 pregnant Mexican women was 0.95 ng/mL [34] and 100 pregnant women in the Netherlands was 1.2 ng/mL [35]. Comparison of urinary BPA concentrations between countries may be confounded by the method of analysis, adjustment for urine dilution, timing of urine collection, as well as age, sex, and genetic differences [3, 36, 37]. However, differences can also be attributed to country specific lifestyle practices including food storage and consumer product use. Therefore, characterizing dietary and behavioral habits may provide insight into the potential exposure pathways and contribution of BPA to human health.

Previous studies have described heterogeneity in disease rates in Egypt based on urban/rural status. Women residing in urban Gharbiah Province of Egypt were found to have a 2-4 times higher incidence rate of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer compared to their rural counterparts [29]. Xenoestrogen exposure during critical windows of development has been proposed to be a likely explanation for increasing cancer incidences, especially in regards to breast cancer [22, 27, 3841]. In this pilot study, however, we did not identify differential exposure to BPA, estimated from the urinary concentrations of BPA, based on residential status in premenstrual Egyptian girls. Both average unadjusted and SG-adjusted BPA concentrations were in the low parts-per-billion range and did not significantly differ between the urban and rural cohorts. Instead, specific gravity differed between urban and rural girls, indicating an underlying variability in fluid consumption, individual health, and/or lifestyle factors within the two cohorts.

It is possible that these data represent cohort-specific xenoestrogen exposure in Egypt, as discrepancies in xenoestrogen exposures between urban and rural populations have previously been observed in several studies [42, 43]. Lower BPA levels were found in sediments in rural compared to urban Okinawa, Japan, suggesting higher BPA exposure from industrial wastes and less so from agricultural activities [44]. Fu and colleagues traced BPA in atmospheric aerosols from urban, rural, marine, and polar regions around the world, and observed higher atmospheric BPA concentrations in urban regions especially in countries like India where open burning of plastic wastes are common practice [45]. Additionally, the preference of urban populations near Alexandria, Egypt for diets high in meat and fat may expose residents to higher levels of synthetic estrogens reported in poultry and meat [46].

These Egyptian girls, as with other populations around the world, are likely to have exposure to a complex mixture of xenobiotics. When we characterized exposure to phthalates within the same population, urban girls exhibited higher specific gravity adjusted urinary concentrations of several phthalate metabolites compared to rural residents, although these differences were not observed in unadjusted concentrations [47]. Characterization of multiple chemical exposures is necessary to understand the impact of the environment on disease, given that a combination of several low level exposures may contribute to a larger xenobiotic body burden and subsequently influence disease incidence [48, 49].

As occupational exposures are unlikely in girls of this age group, the most likely route of exposure is dietary ingestion of BPA [911, 50]. Several studies show migration of BPA from PVC films in food packaging and cans into foodstuff especially at high temperatures [8, 5153]. Epoxy resin containing BPA is widely used to coat metal products such as canned foods and bottle tops [54]. In addition, some food and drink containers are composed of polycarbonate plastics [9, 10]. Therefore, in our study we asked participants about food storage behaviors, and analyzed canned food consumption and food storage in plastic containers as predictors of urinary BPA concentrations. We found a significantly positive association between food storage in plastic containers and BPA concentrations after adjusting for urinary specific gravity, age, BMI, and residential status. A parallel study within this population noted that food storage in plastic was significantly associated with higher urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations [47], suggesting the use of both BPA-containing polycarbonate plastics as well as phthalate-containing PVC storage products by these Egyptian girls. Studies often report BPA exposure from canned food consumption to be relevant [55]; however, our results do not indicate a direct significantly positive association between canned food use and urinary BPA. Interestingly, canned food use improved the association between urinary BPA concentrations and food storage in plastics, acting as a potential confounder. Irrespective of these food consumption and storage behavior associations, BPA concentrations within this Egyptian cohort were significantly lower compared to age- and sex-matched US NHANES data. Comparatively low urinary concentrations of BPA among Egyptian girls may be attributed to the limited use of BPA containing products like thermal paper, and medical equipment, as well as relatively low frequency of plastic food storage and canned food consumption.

Although spot urine samples reflect recent BPA exposure, multiple spot urine testing is recommended for future studies in order to account for temporal variation in exposure [31, 56, 57]. Besides the small sample size and the collection of only one spot urine sample from each girl, a major limitation of this pilot study is the inclusion of only general behavioral questions. Instead, specific analyses of behavioral and dietary habits are required such as whether food stored in cans and plastics were heated or how many canned food or drink products were consumed. Characterization of the types of food stored and the frequency of use may also be necessary, given that Egyptian adults and children are exposed to different diets especially in rural Egypt [58] and that certain foods are more likely to leach BPA from containers [59].

To the best of our knowledge, this study is one of the first to assess food storage practices and urinary BPA concentrations in girls from a developing country. Many exposure assessment studies focus on developed countries; for example, a previous study found a median unadjusted BPA concentration of 1.8 ng/mL among 1,200 6-8 year old girls from three large US cities [60]. Exploring environmental exposures such as BPA at vulnerable stages of development, including the peripubertal period, will be important for assessing potential risks to disease later in life in developing countries. Reports on the Egyptian food market indicate an increased demand for packaged and convenience foods, and the canned food industry is expected to grow rapidly with the reduction of fresh produce [61]. According to the National Food Consumption Survey, an increasing number of Egyptian households reported consumption of ready-made foods and carbonated soft drinks, and substantial differences in food consumption patterns were observed between urban and rural households over several decades [62]. Given the expected expansion of the Egyptian economy, communities must be cognizant of the potential increase in various environmental exposures and consider appropriate actions to prevent potential adverse health outcomes in the future.

Conclusions

In this assessment of BPA in girls in the province of Gharbiah, Egypt, similar concentrations of total urinary BPA concentrations were found between girls residing in urban and rural Egypt. The significant association between food storage in plastics and BPA concentrations suggests that diet is an important route for BPA exposure in this population. A closer look at changing food patterns and the consumer market may provide a better understanding of BPA exposure in developing countries.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Notes

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body Mass Index

BPA: 

Bisphenol A

CAPMAS: 

Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics

CDC: 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

ER: 

Estrogen Receptor

GM: 

Geometric Mean

LOD: 

Limit of Detection

NCEH: 

National Center for Environmental Health

NHANES: 

National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey

PVC: 

Polyvinyl Chloride

SG: 

Specific Gravity.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the University of Michigan Cancer Epidemiology Education in Special Populations Program (R25 CA112383), the University of Michigan NIEHS P30 Core Center (P30 ES017885), with generous support from the UM School of Public Health (SPH) and the SPH Department of Environmental Health Sciences. Support for DCD was provided by NIH grant ES017524, support for KB was provided by Training Grant CA112383, and support for MSN and JAC was provided by NIEHS Institutional Training Grant T32 ES007062. We acknowledge Xiaoyun Ye, Xiaoliu Zhou and Ryan Hennings for measuring the urinary concentrations of BPA and Stacy Endres at NIEHS for her effort in part of the data collection.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan
(2)
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan
(3)
Center for Global Health, University of Michigan
(4)
National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(5)
Tanta Cancer Center and the Gharbiah Cancer Society
(6)
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan

References

  1. Vandenberg LN, Chahoud I, Heindel JJ, Padmanabhan V, Paumgartten FJ, Schoenfelder G: Urinary, circulating, and tissue biomonitoring studies indicate widespread exposure to bisphenol A. Environ Health Perspect. 2010, 118: 1055-1070. 10.1289/ehp.0901716.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Jonathan N, Steinmetz R: Xenoestrogens: the emerging story of bisphenol a. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 1998, 9: 124-128. 10.1016/S1043-2760(98)00029-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, Reidy JA, Needham LL: Exposure of the U.S. population to bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003-2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2008, 116: 39-44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Mountfort KA, Kelly J, Jickells SM, Castle L: Investigations into the potential degradation of polycarbonate baby bottles during sterilization with consequent release of bisphenol A. Food Addit Contam. 1997, 14: 737-740. 10.1080/02652039709374584.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Carwile JL, Luu HT, Bassett LS, Driscoll DA, Yuan C, Chang JY, Ye X, Calafat AM, Michels KB: Polycarbonate bottle use and urinary bisphenol A concentrations. Environ Health Perspect. 2009, 117: 1368-1372.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Sajiki J, Yonekubo J: Leaching of bisphenol A (BPA) from polycarbonate plastic to water containing amino acids and its degradation by radical oxygen species. Chemosphere. 2004, 55: 861-867. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.065.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Nerin C, Fernandez C, Domeno C, Salafranca J: Determination of potential migrants in polycarbonate containers used for microwave ovens by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and fluorescence detection. J Agric Food Chem. 2003, 51: 5647-5653. 10.1021/jf034330p.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Lopez-Cervantes J, Paseiro-Losada P: Determination of bisphenol A in, and its migration from, PVC stretch film used for food packaging. Food Addit Contam. 2003, 20: 596-606. 10.1080/0265203031000109495.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kang JH, Kondo F, Katayama Y: Human exposure to bisphenol A. Toxicology. 2006, 226: 79-89. 10.1016/j.tox.2006.06.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Vandenberg LN, Hauser R, Marcus M, Olea N, Welshons WV: Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA). Reprod Toxicol. 2007, 24: 139-177. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.07.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meeting to Review Toxicological and Health Aspects of Bisphenol A. Edited by: Safety F Ottawa. 2010, 48-
  12. Biedermann S, Tschudin P, Grob K: Transfer of bisphenol A from thermal printer paper to the skin. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010, 398: 571-576. 10.1007/s00216-010-3936-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Calafat AM, Weuve J, Ye X, Jia LT, Hu H, Ringer S, Huttner K, Hauser R: Exposure to bisphenol A and other phenols in neonatal intensive care unit premature infants. Environ Health Perspect. 2009, 117: 639-644.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleisch AF, Sheffield PE, Chinn C, Edelstein BL, Landrigan PJ: Bisphenol A and related compounds in dental materials. Pediatrics. 2010, 126: 760-768. 10.1542/peds.2009-2693.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Vandentorren S, Zeman F, Morin L, Sarter H, Bidondo ML, Oleko A, Leridon H: Bisphenol-A and phthalates contamination of urine samples by catheters in the Elfe pilot study: implications for large-scale biomonitoring studies. Environ Res. 2011, 111: 761-764. 10.1016/j.envres.2011.05.018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Welshons WV, Thayer KA, Judy BM, Taylor JA, Curran EM, vom Saal FS: Large effects from small exposures. I. Mechanisms for endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity. Environ Health Perspect. 2003, 111: 994-1006. 10.1289/ehp.5494.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomas P, Dong J: Binding and activation of the seven-transmembrane estrogen receptor GPR30 by environmental estrogens: a potential novel mechanism of endocrine disruption. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2006, 102: 175-179. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.09.017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Matsushima A, Kakuta Y, Teramoto T, Koshiba T, Liu X, Okada H, Tokunaga T, Kawabata S, Kimura M, Shimohigashi Y: Structural evidence for endocrine disruptor bisphenol A binding to human nuclear receptor ERR gamma. J Biochem. 2007, 142: 517-524. 10.1093/jb/mvm158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Richter CA, Birnbaum LS, Farabollini F, Newbold RR, Rubin BS, Talsness CE, Vandenbergh JG, Walser-Kuntz DR, vom Saal FS: In vivo effects of bisphenol A in laboratory rodent studies. Reprod Toxicol. 2007, 24: 199-224. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.06.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Wetherill YB, Akingbemi BT, Kanno J, McLachlan JA, Nadal A, Sonnenschein C, Watson CS, Zoeller RT, Belcher SM: In vitro molecular mechanisms of bisphenol A action. Reprod Toxicol. 2007, 24: 178-198. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.05.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Brody JG, Moysich KB, Humblet O, Attfield KR, Beehler GP, Rudel RA: Environmental pollutants and breast cancer: epidemiologic studies. Cancer. 2007, 109: 2667-2711. 10.1002/cncr.22655.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Dey S, Zhang Z, Hablas A, Seifeldein IA, Ramadan M, El-Hamzawy H, Soliman AS: Geographic patterns of cancer in the population-based registry of Egypt: Possible links to environmental exposures. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011, 35: 254-264. 10.1016/j.canep.2010.09.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lang IA, Galloway TS, Scarlett A, Henley WE, Depledge M, Wallace RB, Melzer D: Association of urinary bisphenol A concentration with medical disorders and laboratory abnormalities in adults. JAMA. 2008, 300: 1303-1310. 10.1001/jama.300.11.1303.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Braun JM, Kalkbrenner AE, Calafat AM, Yolton K, Ye X, Dietrich KN, Lanphear BP: Impact of early-life bisphenol a exposure on behavior and executive function in children. Pediatrics. 2011, 128: 873-882. 10.1542/peds.2011-1335.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Meeker JD, Yang T, Ye X, Calafat AM, Hauser R: Urinary concentrations of parabens and serum hormone levels, semen quality parameters, and sperm DNA damage. Environ Health Perspect. 2011, 119: 252-257.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Bourguignon JP, Giudice LC, Hauser R, Prins GS, Soto AM, Zoeller RT, Gore AC: Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr Rev. 2009, 30: 293-342. 10.1210/er.2009-0002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Dey S, Soliman AS, Merajver SD: Xenoestrogens may be the cause of high and increasing rates of hormone receptor positive breast cancer in the world. Med Hypotheses. 2009, 72: 652-656. 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.10.025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Dey S, Zhang Z, Hablas A, Seifeldein IA, Ramadan M, El-Hamzawy H, Soliman AS: Geographic patterns of cancer in the population-based registry of Egypt: Possible links to environmental exposures. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011, 35: 254-264. 10.1016/j.canep.2010.09.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Dey S, Soliman AS, Hablas A, Seifeldein IA, Ismail K, Ramadan M, El-Hamzawy H, Wilson ML, Banerjee M, Boffetta P, Harford J, Merajver SD: Urban-rural differences in breast cancer incidence in Egypt (1999-2006). Breast. 2010, 19: 417-423. 10.1016/j.breast.2010.04.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Ye X, Kuklenyik Z, Needham LL, Calafat AM: Automated on-line column-switching HPLC-MS/MS method with peak focusing for the determination of nine environmental phenols in urine. Anal Chem. 2005, 77: 5407-5413. 10.1021/ac050390d.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Mahalingaiah S, Meeker JD, Pearson KR, Calafat AM, Ye X, Petrozza J, Hauser R: Temporal variability and predictors of urinary bisphenol A concentrations in men and women. Environ Health Perspect. 2008, 116: 173-178.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller RC, Brindle E, Holman DJ, Shofer J, Klein NA, Soules MR, O'Connor KA: Comparison of specific gravity and creatinine for normalizing urinary reproductive hormone concentrations. Clin Chem. 2004, 50: 924-932. 10.1373/clinchem.2004.032292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Ouchi K, Watanabe S: Measurement of bisphenol A in human urine using liquid chromatography with multi-channel coulometric electrochemical detection. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2002, 780: 365-370. 10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00547-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Cantonwine D, Meeker JD, Hu H, Sanchez BN, Lamadrid-Figueroa H, Mercado-Garcia A, Fortenberry GZ, Calafat AM, Tellez-Rojo MM: Bisphenol a exposure in Mexico City and risk of prematurity: a pilot nested case control study. Environ Health. 2010, 9: 62-10.1186/1476-069X-9-62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ye X, Pierik FH, Hauser R, Duty S, Angerer J, Park MM, Burdorf A, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW, Mackenbach JP, Steegers EA, Tiemeier H, Longnecker MP: Urinary metabolite concentrations of organophosphorous pesticides, bisphenol A, and phthalates among pregnant women in Rotterdam, the Netherlands: the Generation R study. Environ Res. 2008, 108: 260-267. 10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang M, Kim SY, Lee SM, Chang SS, Kawamoto T, Jang JY, Ahn YO: Biological monitoring of bisphenol a in a Korean population. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003, 44: 546-551. 10.1007/s00244-002-2124-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Volkel W, Bittner N, Dekant W: Quantitation of bisphenol A and bisphenol A glucuronide in biological samples by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Drug Metab Dispos. 2005, 33: 1748-1757. 10.1124/dmd.105.005454.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Ibarluzea Jm J, Fernandez MF, Santa-Marina L, Olea-Serrano MF, Rivas AM, Aurrekoetxea JJ, Exposito J, Lorenzo M, Torne P, Villalobos M, Pedraza V, Sasco AJ, Olea N: Breast cancer risk and the combined effect of environmental estrogens. Cancer Causes Control. 2004, 15: 591-600.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Fernandez SV, Russo J: Estrogen and xenoestrogens in breast cancer. Toxicol Pathol. 2010, 38: 110-122. 10.1177/0192623309354108.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Tokunaga M, Land CE, Tokuoka S, Nishimori I, Soda M, Akiba S: Incidence of female breast cancer among atomic bomb survivors, 1950-1985. Radiat Res. 1994, 138: 209-223. 10.2307/3578591.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Cohn BA, Wolff MS, Cirillo PM, Sholtz RI: DDT and breast cancer in young women: new data on the significance of age at exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2007, 115: 1406-1414.Google Scholar
  42. Rozati R, Reddy PP, Reddanna P, Mujtaba R: Role of environmental estrogens in the deterioration of male factor fertility. Fertil Steril. 2002, 78: 1187-1194. 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04389-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Cruz S, Lino C, Silveira MI: Evaluation of organochlorine pesticide residues in human serum from an urban and two rural populations in Portugal. Sci Total Environ. 2003, 317: 23-35. 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00334-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Kitada Y, Kawahata H, Suzuki A, Oomori T: Distribution of pesticides and bisphenol A in sediments collected from rivers adjacent to coral reefs. Chemosphere. 2008, 71: 2082-2090. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.01.025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Fu P, Kawamura K: Ubiquity of bisphenol A in the atmosphere. Environ Pollut. 2010, 158: 3138-3143. 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.040.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Sadek IA: Survey of hormonal levels in meat and poultry sold in Alexandria. Egypt. East Mediterr Health J. 1998, 4: 239-Google Scholar
  47. Colacino JA, Soliman AS, Calafat AM, Nahar MS, Van Zomeren-Dohm A, Hablas A, Seifeldin IA, Rozek LS, Dolinoy DC: Exposure to phthalates among premenstrual girls from rural and urban Gharbiah. Egypt: A pilot exposure assessment study. Environ Health. 2011, 10: 40-10.1186/1476-069X-10-40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Darbre PD, Charles AK: Environmental oestrogens and breast cancer: evidence for combined involvement of dietary, household and cosmetic xenoestrogens. Anticancer Res. 2010, 30: 815-827.Google Scholar
  49. Kortenkamp A: Breast cancer, oestrogens and environmental pollutants: a re-evaluation from a mixture perspective. Int J Androl. 2006, 29: 193-198. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00613.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Morgan MK, Jones PA, Calafat AM, Ye X, Croghan CW, Chuang JC, Wilson NK, Clifton MS, Figueroa Z, Sheldon LS: Assessing the Quantitative Relationships between Preschool Children's Exposures to Bisphenol A by Route and Urinary Biomonitoring. Environ Sci Technol. 2011, 45: 5309-5316. 10.1021/es200537u.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Munguia-Lopez EM, Gerardo-Lugo S, Peralta E, Bolumen S, Soto-Valdez H: Migration of bisphenol A (BPA) from can coatings into a fatty-food simulant and tuna fish. Food Addit Contam. 2005, 22: 892-898. 10.1080/02652030500163674.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Munguia-Lopez EM, Soto-Valdez H: Effect of heat processing and storage time on migration of bisphenol A (BPA) and bisphenol A-diglycidyl ether (BADGE) to aqueous food simulant from Mexican can coatings. J Agric Food Chem. 2001, 49: 3666-3671. 10.1021/jf0009044.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Guart A, Bono-Blay F, Borrell A, Lacorte S: Migration of plasticizersphthalates, bisphenol A and alkylphenols from plastic containers and evaluation of risk. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2011, 28: 676-685.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Kang JH, Kito K, Kondo F: Factors influencing the migration of bisphenol A from cans. J Food Prot. 2003, 66: 1444-1447.Google Scholar
  55. Carwile JL, Ye X, Zhou X, Calafat AM, Michels KB: Canned soup consumption and urinary bisphenol A: a randomized crossover trial. JAMA. 2011, 306: 2218-2220.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Teitelbaum SL, Britton JA, Calafat AM, Ye X, Silva MJ, Reidy JA, Galvez MP, Brenner BL, Wolff MS: Temporal variability in urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites, phytoestrogens and phenols among minority children in the United States. Environ Res. 2008, 106: 257-269. 10.1016/j.envres.2007.09.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Ye X, Wong LY, Bishop AM, Calafat AM: Variability of urinary concentrations of bisphenol A in spot samples, first morning voids, and 24-hour collections. Environ Health Perspect. 2011, 119: 983-988. 10.1289/ehp.1002701.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Sukkary-Stolba S: Food classifications and the diets of young children in rural Egypt. Soc Sci Med. 1987, 25: 401-404. 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90278-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Noonan GO, Ackerman LK, Begley TH: Concentration of bisphenol A in highly consumed canned foods on the U.S. market. J Agric Food Chem. 2011, 59: 7178-7185. 10.1021/jf201076f.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolff MS, Teitelbaum SL, Pinney SM, Windham G, Liao L, Biro F, Kushi LH, Erdmann C, Hiatt RA, Rybak ME, Calafat AM: Investigation of relationships between urinary biomarkers of phytoestrogens, phthalates, and phenols and pubertal stages in girls. Environ Health Perspect. 2010, 118: 1039-1046. 10.1289/ehp.0901690.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Abdel-Aziz H: Egypt: An overview of the food market. 2008, Service USC. Alexandria, Egypt: U.S Commercial Service in Alexandria, Egypt., 3-Google Scholar
  62. Galal OM: The nutrition transition in Egypt: obesity, undernutrition and the food consumption context. Public Health Nutr. 2002, 5: 141-148.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nahar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.