Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Traffic air pollution and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all causes: a Danish cohort study

  • Ole Raaschou-Nielsen1Email author,
  • Zorana Jovanovic Andersen1, 2,
  • Steen Solvang Jensen3,
  • Matthias Ketzel3,
  • Mette Sørensen1,
  • Johnni Hansen1,
  • Steffen Loft4,
  • Anne Tjønneland1 and
  • Kim Overvad5
Environmental Health201211:60

DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-60

Received: 30 March 2012

Accepted: 28 August 2012

Published: 5 September 2012

Abstract

Background

Traffic air pollution has been linked to cardiovascular mortality, which might be due to co-exposure to road traffic noise. Further, personal and lifestyle characteristics might modify any association.

Methods

We followed up 52 061 participants in a Danish cohort for mortality in the nationwide Register of Causes of Death, from enrollment in 1993–1997 through 2009, and traced their residential addresses from 1971 onwards in the Central Population Registry. We used dispersion-modelled concentration of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) since 1971 as indicator of traffic air pollution and used Cox regression models to estimate mortality rate ratios (MRRs) with adjustment for potential confounders.

Results

Mean levels of NO2 at the residence since 1971 were significantly associated with mortality from cardiovascular disease (MRR, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06–1.51, per doubling of NO2 concentration) and all causes (MRR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04–1.23, per doubling of NO2 concentration) after adjustment for potential confounders. For participants who ate < 200 g of fruit and vegetables per day, the MRR was 1.45 (95% CI, 1.13–1.87) for mortality from cardiovascular disease and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.11–1.42) for mortality from all causes.

Conclusions

Traffic air pollution is associated with mortality from cardiovascular diseases and all causes, after adjustment for traffic noise. The association was strongest for people with a low fruit and vegetable intake.

Keywords

Traffic Air pollution Cardiovascular mortality Total mortality Cohort

Background

Although several recent studies have shown associations between long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all causes[19], several questions remain open. Exposure to road traffic noise might explain the observed associations, as this has been associated with morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease[10]. Furthermore, air pollution could affect the risk for cardiovascular disease through mechanisms involving systemic oxidative stress and inflammation, which could drive atherosclerosis progression and other long-term effects as well as serve as triggers of events through changes in vascular function, thrombogenecity, plaque stability and autonomic balance[11]; the amount of fruit and vegetables in the diet, containing antioxidants and related compounds, might therefore modify the effect of air pollution as suggested for short-term mortality in a case-crossover study in Hongkong[12]. People with pre-existing cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus might be particularly susceptible to the effects of air pollution on cardiovascular mortality. Exposure to air pollution decades back in time and perhaps throughout life might be important in the development of chronic cardiovascular disease[13]. Most previous studies of long-term exposure, however, have focused on the addresses of participants at baseline, and few studies have investigated exposure assessed from address history[4, 6, 14, 15].

We report here the results of a Danish cohort study of the a-priori hypothesis that mortality from cardiovascular disease and all causes is associated with long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution at the residence, derived from residential histories from 1971 onwards. Road traffic noise and other potential confounders were adjusted for, and possible effect modification by personal and lifestyle characteristics was investigated.

Methods

Design and study participants. Between 1993 and 1997, a population-based sample of 57 053 men (48%) and women (52%) aged 50–64 years and living in the Copenhagen and Aarhus areas, born in Denmark and with no previous cancer diagnosis, were enrolled into the Diet, Cancer and Health cohort study[16]. The examination at baseline, i.e. enrollment, included a self-administered questionnaire on average dietary habits over the last year, which covered 192 food and beverage items. The participants also filled in a questionnaire on smoking habits (status, intensity and duration), occupation, length of school attendance, physical activity, history of diseases and medication, and a number of other health-related items[16]. Staff in the study clinics obtained anthropometric measurements, including height and weight. The average gross income in the municipality of residence at the time of enrollment was provided by Statistics Denmark. Relevant Danish ethical committees and data protection agencies approved the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Each cohort member was followed up for death, including date and underlying cause, from cardiovascular disease (ICD-10 codes I00–I99), from the date of inclusion into the cohort until 31 December 2009 in the Danish Register of Causes of Death, by use of the unique personal identification number[17]. Participants who died of external causes (ICD-10 codes S–Z) were censored at the date of death. We extracted the date of emigration or disappearance and the addresses of all cohort members between 1 January 1971 and 31 December 2009 from the Central Population Registry by use of the personal identification number, including the dates of moving to and from each address. The addresses were linked to the Danish address database to obtain geographical coordinates (‘geocodes’), which were obtained for 94% of the addresses.

Exposure assessment. The outdoor concentration of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was calculated at the residential addresses of each cohort member with the Danish AirGIS dispersion modeling system (seehttp://www.dmu.dk/en/air/models/airgis/). AirGIS is based on a geographical information system (GIS) and provides estimates of traffic-related air pollution with high temporal and address-level spatial resolution. Air pollution at a location was calculated as the sum of: (1) local air pollution from street traffic, calculated from traffic (intensity and type), emission factors for the car fleet, street and building geometry and meteorology; (2) urban background, calculated from data on urban vehicle emission density, city dimensions and building heights; and (3) regional background, estimated from trends at rural monitoring stations and from national vehicle emissions. With the geocode of an address and a specified year as the starting point, the AirGIS system automatically generates street configuration data for the street pollution model, including street orientation, street width, building heights in wind sectors, amount of traffic, speed and type as well as other required data.

The AirGIS system has been validated in several studies[1821], and the correlation between modelled and measured half-year mean NO2 concentrations at 204 positions in the greater Copenhagen area showed a correlation coefficient of 0.90, measured concentrations being on average 11% lower than those modelled[20]. We also compared modelled and measured 1-month mean concentrations of NOx and NO2 over 12 years (1995–2006) on a busy street in Copenhagen (Jagtvej, 25 000 vehicles per day, street canyon), with correlation coefficients of 0.88 for NOx and 0.67 for NO2. The modelled mean concentration over the whole 12-year period was 6% lower than the measured concentrations of NOx and 12% lower than those of NO2[21]. Thus, the model predicted both geographical and temporal variation well.

We used the concentration of NO2 as an indicator of air pollution from traffic. We calculated the yearly averages of NO2 concentration at all addresses from 1 January 1971 until date of death, censoring or end of follow-up and entered time-weighted average NO2 concentration from 1971 as a time-dependent variable into the statistical risk model, thus recalculating exposure for survivors at the time of each death. If an address could not be geocoded, the preceding address was used for NO2 calculation; if the first address was missing, the subsequent address was used. We included only participants for whom the residential addresses were known and geocoded for 80% or more of the time from 1 January 1971 to death, censoring or end of follow-up.

Potential confounders and effect modifiers. We defined potential confounding factors a priori from evidence of an association with mortality and modeled them as categorical or continuous. The continuous variables were modeled as linear or a non-linear cubic spline function. The covariates, assessed at baseline, were: sex; calendar year (spline); unemployment during year before enrollment (yes/no); length of school attendance (< 8, 8–10 and > 10 years); risky occupation, defined as job held for a minimum of 1 year with potential exposure to smoke, particles, fumes or chemicals (yes/no) (mining, rubber industry, tannery, chemical industry, wood-processing industry, metal processing [welding, painting, electroplating], foundry, steel-rolling mill, shipyard, glass industry, graphics industry, building industry [roofer, asphalt worker, demolition worker], truck, bus or taxi driver, manufacture of asbestos or asbestos cement, asbestos insulation, cement article industry, china and pottery industry, painter, welder, hairdresser, auto mechanic); smoking status (never, former, current); smoking intensity (lifetime average, spline, calculated by equating a cigarette to 1 g, a cheroot or a pipe to 3 g, and a cigar to 4.5 g of tobacco); smoking duration (total number of years smoking, linear) (smoking status, intensity and duration were adjusted for as three separate variables); environmental tobacco smoke (indicator of exposure, e.g. “smoker in the home or/and exposure at work for at least 4 h/day”); physically active sport (categorical yes/no indicator and linear intensity among active people); body mass index (spline); waist circumference (linear); alcohol intake (categorical yes/no indicator and spline for intensity among drinkers); fat intake (linear); fruit and vegetable intake (linear); fiber intake (linear); fish intake (linear); folate intake (linear); use of hormone replacement therapy (categorical yes/no indicator and linear duration among users); noise at the baseline address (linear); and average gross income in 1995 in the municipality of residence at the time of enrollment (spline).

Road traffic noise was calculated as the A-weighted sound pressure level at the most exposed facade of the baseline residence during the day, evening and night, expressed as Lden as an indicator of the overall noise level during 24 h, with a 5 dB penalty for the evening and a 10 dB penalty for the night[22]. We used the noise calculation software Soundplan (version 6.5,http://www.soundplan.dk) and the joint Nordic prediction method for road traffic noise, which has been the standard method for noise calculation in Scandinavia for many years; see details elsewhere[22]. The prespecified potential effect modifiers were: sex, educational level, body mass index, physical activity, intake of fruit and vegetables, smoking status and pre-existing morbidity at baseline.

Statistical methods. Mortality rate ratios (MRRs) were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models with Stata 11.0 and left truncation, with age as the time scale. Participants were censored at the time of loss to follow-up due to emigration or disappearance or 31 December 2009, whichever came first. NO2 was modeled as a time-dependent variable. The distribution of NO2 levels at addresses from 1971 until death or censoring was right-skewed (Figure1); we log-transformed the NO2 concentration using logbase 2, corresponding to interpretation of MRRs as “per doubling of exposure” to avoid excessive influence from observations in the right tail of the distribution and because the NO2-mortality function fitted better to a linear model after log-transformation of NO2. We investigated the shape of the exposure–mortality function for each continuous potential confounder using cubic splines to determine whether the variable should be modeled as linear or as a spline in the final models.
Figure 1

Distribution of NO 2 . Time-weighted average concentrations of NO2 at the residential addresses of 52 061 cohort participants from 1971 onwards.

We investigated interactions with the likelihood ratio test, comparing models with and without an interaction term. The potential effect modifiers were tested one at a time in the fully adjusted model. Marital status (single, married, divorced, widow or widower) did not fulfill the proportional hazard assumption and, therefore, we did not adjust for this variable. Instead we specified separate baseline hazards for each level of marital status (stratified Cox model). Exposure–response functions with 95% confidence limits (CIs) were estimated and visualized using restricted cubic splines (library Survival and library Design in R statistical software 2.9.0) adjusting for the potential confounders.

We used 5% as level of significance.

Sensitivity analyses. We tested the sensitivity to alternative exposure definitions, adjustment for pre-existing disease, use of non-logged NO2 concentrations and use of frailty models with municipality as a random effect to take into account spatial correlation at municipality level (see Additional file1: Supplemental methods).

Results

Of 57 053 enrolled cohort members, 571 were excluded because of a cancer diagnosis before baseline, two because of uncertain date of cancer diagnosis, 960 for whom an address history was not available in the Central Population Registry or their address at baseline could not be geocoded, 948 because exposure was assessed for less than 80% of the time between 1 January 1971 and death or censoring, and 2511 for whom a value was missing for a potential confounder or effect modifier, leaving 52 061 cohort members for the study. These participants were followed up for an average of 13.0 years, during which time 5534 died from non-external causes, providing a crude mortality rate of 817 per 100 000 person–years at risk.

Table1 and Table S1 (see Additional file2: Table S1) show the baseline characteristics of the 52 061 cohort members, who were on average 56.7 years old, with slightly more women than men. Compared to the whole cohort, those who died during follow up had shorter school attendance, more were divorced, unemployed, occupationally exposed to air pollution, smokers and exposed to environmental tobacco smoke, had a higher intake of fat, a lower intake of fruit and vegetables, were less physically active, had pre-existing cardiovascular disease and were living close to dense traffic and in a municipality with low average income. Furthermore, among those living at locations with high NO2 levels, more were single or divorced, were smokers and exposed to environmental tobacco smoke, less physical activity, used hormone replacement therapy and were exposed to a higher noise level; many characteristics were, however, similar for people living at residences with high and low levels of NO2. The mean NO2 concentration at the residences of all participants after 1971 was 16.9 μg/m3 (minimum, 10.5 μg/m3; median, 15.1 μg/m3; maximum, 59.6 μg/m3), with similar mean and median values for participants living in municipalities below the median income level (16.8 and 14.5 μg/m3) and above the median income level (16.9 and 15.9 μg/m3). Noise at the baseline addresses of the study participants correlated with the NO2 measures: Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r s ) = 0.59 in comparison with the average NO2 at all addresses after 1971 and r s  = 0.64 in comparison with NO2 at the baseline address.
Table 1

Characteristics of 52 061 study participants, those who died during follow-up and those exposed to low and high levels of NO 2 at their residences (See Additional file 2 : Table S1 , Additional file 2 for further characteristics)

Characteristica

Cohort

All-cause deathsb

NO2 c<19.0 μg/m3

NO2≥19.0 μg/m3

% (No.)

Median (5–95 percentile)

% (No.)

Median (5–95 percentile)

% (No.)

Median (5–95 percentile)

% (No.)

Median (5–95 percentile)

All participants

100% (52 061)

 

10.6% (5534)

 

75.0% (39 045)

 

25.0% (13 016)

 

Age at baseline (years)

 

56.1 (50.7-64.1)

 

59.1 (51.2-64.7)

 

56.1 (50.7-64.1)

 

56.2 (50.7-64.2)

Sex

        

 Male

47.5% (24 734)

 

59.5% (3 292)

 

48.0% (18 734)

 

46.1% (6 000)

 

 Female

52.5% (27 327)

 

40.5% (2 242)

 

52.0% (20 311)

 

53.9% (7 016)

 

School attendance (years)

        

 < 8

32.8% (17 064)

 

42.2% (2 349)

 

32.4% (12 653)

 

33.9% (4 411)

 

 8-10

46.2% (24 066)

 

41.1 % (2 274)

 

46.5% (18 169)

 

45.3% (5 897)

 

 > 10

21.0% (10 931)

 

16.5% (911)

 

21.1% (8 223)

 

20.8% (2 708)

 

Body mass index (kg/m2)

 

25.5 (20.4-33.3)

 

26.0 (19.8-34.6)

 

25.5 (20.5-33.1)

 

25.6 (20.3-33.9)

Physical activity (sport)

        

 No

45.7% (23 787)

 

60.4% (3 345)

 

43.8% (17 104)

 

51.3% (6 683)

 

 Yes (h/week)

54.3% (28 274)

2.0 (0.5-7.0)

39.6% (2 189)

2.0 (0.5-7.0)

56.2% (21 941)

2.0 (0.5-6.5)

48.7% (6 333)

2.0 (0.5-7.0)

Smoking

        

 Never

36.0% (18 766)

 

18.4% (1 021)

 

37.5% (14 667)

 

31.5% (4 099)

 

 Former

27.6% (14 354)

 

22.6% (1 249)

 

28.5% (11 107)

 

24.9% (3 247)

 

 Current

36.4% (18 941)

 

59.0% (3 264)

 

34.0% (13 271)

 

43.5% (5 670)

 

 Intensity (g/day) d

 

14.8 (3.8-34.4)

 

17.3 (6.0-36.7)

 

14.6 (3.7-34.6)

 

15.2 (4.0-34.1)

 Duration (years) d

 

33.0 (7.0-46.0)

 

38.0 (12.0-49.0)

 

32.0 (7.0-46.0)

 

34.0 (8.0-46.0)

Fruit and vegetable intake (g/day)

 

312 (96.0-734)

 

265 (71.8 -704)

 

315 (101-726)

 

301 (85.0 -754)

Cardiovascular disease at enrolment (any of the five below)

23.1% (12 015)

 

33.0% (1 828)

 

23.0% (8 973)

 

23.4% (3 042)

 

 Myocardial infarction

2.0% (1 061)

 

6.4% (356)

 

2.0% (768)

 

2.2% (293)

 

 Angina pectoris

3.1% (1 604)

 

6.3% (348)

 

3.0% (1 190)

 

3.2% (414)

 

 Stroke

1.3% (682)

 

3.4% (187)

 

1.3% (498)

 

1.4% (184)

 

 Hypertension

16.3% (8 485)

 

22.6% (1 251)

 

16.1% (6 303)

 

16.8% (2 182)

 

 Hypercholesterolemia

7.4% (3 880)

 

10.0% (554)

 

7.6% (2 985)

 

6.9% (895)

 

Diabetes mellitus at baseline

2.0% (1 069)

 

5.1% (284)

 

1.9% (754)

 

2.4% (315)

 

NO2 at front door (μg/m3) since 1971c

 

15.1 (11.5-27.1)

 

16.6 (11.6-29.5)

 

14.2 (11.4-18.5)

 

22.1 (19.2-34.8)

Major roade within 50 m of address at baseline

        

 No

92.0% (47 886)

 

89.6% (4 958)

 

97.0% (37 856)

 

77.1% (10 030)

 

 Yes

8.0% (4 175)

 

10.4% (576)

 

3.0% (1 189)

 

22.9% (2 986)

 

Traffic load within 200 m of the address at baseline (103 vehicle km/day)

 

2.5 (0.3-15.1)

 

3.5 (0.3-16.1)

 

1.7 (0.2-12.0)

 

6.9 (0.6-22.9)

Noise (L den ) at baseline address (dB)

 

56.4 (48.4-70.0)

 

57.9 (48.9-71.0)

 

54.6 (48.0-66.3)

 

63.4 (52.2-73.1)

a At baseline unless otherwise specified.

bExcluding external cause of death.

cTime-weighted average for the period 1 January 1971 to death, censoring or end of follow-up.

dBased on all people who had ever smoked; lifetime average smoking intensity.

eMore than 10 000 vehicles per day.

Table2 shows that NO2 at the residence after 1971 was associated with mortality from cardiovascular disease and all causes. The MRRs for the different causes of death ranged from 1.40 to 2.50 in association with a doubling of the NO2 concentration in the basic model, with adjustment for age and sex. All MRRs were attenuated by further adjustment for various covariates; additional adjustment for road traffic noise at the enrollment address further attenuated the MRRs, although only marginally for mortality from cerebrovascular disease and ‘other’ cardiovascular diseases. In the fully adjusted model, a doubling of the NO2 concentration at the residence was associated with a 26% (95% CI, 6–51%) higher cardiovascular mortality rate, a 71% (95% CI, 25-137%) higher ‘other’ cardiovascular mortality rate and a 13% (95% CI, 4–23%) higher all-cause mortality rate. Figure2 shows almost linear exposure–response functions between log-NO2 and MRRs for all cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease and all causes. Tentative adjustment for pre-existing morbidity at baseline provided virtually identical results (results not shown).
Table 2

Mortality rate ratios associated with time-weighted average concentration of NO 2 from 1971 onwards at residential addresses

  

Mortality rate ratioa(95% CI)

Mortality (ICD-10 codes)

Ndeaths

Model with adjustment for sex and ageb

Model with further adjustment for various variablesc

Model with further adjustment for noised

All causes (except external, S-Z)

5534

1.52 (1.42-1.62)

1.18 (1.10-1.26)

1.13 (1.04-1.23)

Cardiovascular (I00-99)

1285

1.71 (1.50-1.94)

1.33 (1.16-1.54)

1.26 (1.06-1.51)

Ischemic heart disease (I20-25)

548

1.48 (1.21-1.82)

1.23 (0.99-1.54)

1.12 (0.85-1.47)

Cardiac rhythm disturbances (I44 + I47-49)

25

2.32 (0.95-5.67)

1.41 (0.50-3.94)

1.01 (0.28-3.65)

Heart failure (I50)

44

1.89 (0.94-3.80)

1.14 (0.52-2.51)

0.94 (0.35-2.53)

Cerebrovascular disease (I60-69)

292

1.40 (1.06-1.86)

1.13 (0.83-1.53)

1.11 (0.78-1.63)

Other cardiovascular disease

376

2.46 (1.96-2.09)

1.80 (1.41-2.32)

1.71 (1.25-2.37)

Results based on 677 761 person-years at risk for 52 061 cohort participants from baseline (1993-1997) through 2009.

aGiven per doubling of the NO2 concentration.

bAdjusted for sex and age (age was the time scale in the Cox models).

c Adjusted for sex, age (age was the time scale), calendar year, employment status, school attendance, occupation with potential exposure to smoke and fumes, smoking status, smoking intensity, smoking duration, environmental tobacco smoke, alcohol, fat, fish, fruit and vegetables, fiber, folate, body mass index, waist circumference, physical activity with sport, hormone replacement therapy, average gross income of municipality of residence in 1995. The Cox model stratified for marital status.

dAs previous model with further adjustment for noise at the baseline address.

Figure 2

Spline functions between NO 2 and mortality. Spline functions (filled lines; 95% confidence limits indicated by dashed lines) between average NO2 concentration (μg/m3) at residences from 1971 onwards and mortality from all causes and cardiovascular disease. Functions adjusted for the same potential confounders as those relevant for results in the last column of Table2.

We compared the results based on our primary exposure measure (NO2 since 1971) with those for four alternative exposure measures: NO2 since 1991, NO2 at the baseline address, presence of a major road within 50 m and total traffic load within 200 m of the baseline address (Table3). The two long-term NO2 measures (NO2 since 1971 and 1991) showed the strongest associations with mortality; NO2 at the baseline address showed weaker associations, and the two measures of traffic at the baseline address showed even weaker associations. The results for the subcohort living at the baseline address throughout the followup period were virtually identical ( Additional file3: Table S2).
Table 3

Mortality rate ratios associated with different exposure measures at residential addresses

 

Mortality rate ratioa(95% confidence interval)

Exposure

All causes (n = 5534)

Cardiovascular disease (n = 1285)

Ischemic heart disease (n = 548)

Cerebrovascular disease (n = 292)

Other cardiovascular disease (n = 376)

NO2 from 1971 onwardsb

1.13 (1.04-1.23)

1.26 (1.06-1.51)

1.12 (0.85-1.47)

1.11 (0.76-1.63)

1.72 (1.25-2.37)

NO2 from 1991 onwardsb

1.13 (1.05-1.22)

1.21 (1.02-1.42)

1.13 (0.88-1.45)

0.99 (0.70-1.41)

1.56 (1.17-2.10)

NO2 (1-year mean) at address at baselineb

1.09 (1.01-1.19)

1.16 (0.99-1.37)

1.09 (0.85-1.41)

1.06 (0.75-1.52)

1.42 (1.06-1.92)

Major road within 50 of address at baseline

0.94 (0.85-1.05)

0.98 (0.79-1.21)

1.04 (0.76-1.44)

0.87 (0.54-1.39)

1.03 (0.71-1.49)

Traffic load within 200 m of address at baselinec

1.01 (0.99-1.03)

1.02 (0.98-1.06)

1.01 (0.95-1.07)

1.02 (0.94-1.11)

1.03 (0.96-1.11)

Results based on 677 761 person–years at risk for 52 061 cohort participants from baseline (1993–1997) through 2009.

aAdjusted for sex, age (age was the time scale), calendar year, employment status, school attendance, occupation with potential exposure to smoke and fumes, smoking status, smoking intensity, smoking duration, environmental tobacco smoke, alcohol, fat, fish, fruit and vegetables, fiber, folate, body mass index, waist circumference, physical activity with sport, hormone replacement therapy, average gross income of municipality of residence in 1995 and noise at the baseline address. The Cox model stratified for marital status.

bThe mortality rate ratio is given per doubling of the NO2 concentration. The three NO2 measures correlated strongly; rs = 0.92 between NO2 from1971 and NO2 from 1991; rs = 0.87 between NO2 from1971 and NO2 at baseline; rs = 0.95 between NO2 from1991 and NO2 at baseline.

cThe mortality rate ratio is given per doubling of the traffic load.

Figure3 and Table4 show effect modification by intake of fruit and vegetables, which was consistent for all three cardiovascular mortality end-points: the MRRs were highest for people with low intake of fruit and vegetables (< 200 g/day), intermediate for those eating 200–400 g fruit and vegetables per day and lowest for those with a high intake (> 400 g/day). The results showed no clear differences in MRRs between people with and without pre-existing morbidity at baseline or any of the other potential effect modifiers (Table4). Additional file4: Table S3, gives the numbers of deaths and person–years at risk corresponding to the cells in Table4.
Figure 3

Mortality rate ratios by intake of fruit and vegetables. Mortality rate ratios (MRR, dots) with 95% confidence intervals (whiskers) for all causes, all cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease associated with NO2 concentrations at residences since 1971, by three levels of intake of fruit and vegetables.

Table 4

Mortality rate ratios associated with NO 2 at the front door from 1971 onwards among 52 061 cohort participants, by potential effect modifiers

Potential effect modifier

Covariate level

Mortality rate ratio (95% CI)a

  

All causes

Cardiovascular disease

Ischemic heart disease

Cerebrovascular disease

Whole cohortb

 

1.13 (1.04-1.23)

1.26 (1.06-1.51)

1.12 (0.85-1.47)

1.11 (0.78-1.63)

Sex

Male

1.19 (1.07-1.32)

1.28 (1.05-1.56)

1.15 (0.85-1.54)

1.31 (0.84-2.04)

 

Female

1.05 (0.94-1.19)

1.22 (0.93-1.60)

1.03 (0.65-1.53)

0.89 (0.53-1.50)

 

p for interaction

0.08

0.74

0.66

0.20

School attendance (years)

< 8

1.15 (1.03-1.29)

1.25 (1.00-1.56)

1.07 (0.76-1.50)

1.13 (0.68-1.87)

 

8-10

1.16 (1.03-1.30)

1.34 (1.05-1.71)

1.17 (0.80-1.71)

1.02 (0.61-1.71)

 

> 10

0.99 (0.83-1.19)

1.11 (0.76-1.61)

1.20 (0.65-2.23)

1.34 (0.64-2.78)

 

p for interaction

0.22

0.79

0.65

0.80

Body mass index (kg/m2)

< 25

1.12 (1.00-1.26)

1.13 (0.90-1.55)

1.14 (0.74-1.74)

0.99 (0.58-1.68)

 

25-30

1.15 (1.02-1.29)

1.33 (1.06-1.67)

1.22 (0.85-1.73)

1.31 (0.81-2.13)

 

> 30

1.13 (0.96-1.32)

1.24 (0.93-1.66)

0.96 (0.62-1.49)

0.92 (0.42-1.99)

 

p for interaction

0.91

0.84

0.51

0.90

Physical activity (sport)

No

1.17 (1.05-1.29)

1.25 (1.02-1.53)

1.15 (0.84-1.56)

1.05 (0.68-1.64)

 

Yes

1.08 (0.95-1.22)

1.29 (1.01-1.66)

1.07 (0.72-1.59)

1.22 (0.72-2.07)

 

p for interaction

0.25

0.80

0.75

0.63

Fruit and vegetable consumption (g/day)

< 200

1.25 (1.11-1.42)

1.45 (1.13-1.87)

1.45 (0.98-2.14)

1.38 (0.79-2.37)

 

200-400

1.06 (0.95-1.20)

1.23 (0.97-1.56)

1.10 (0.76-1.58)

1.29 (0.79-2.11)

 

> 400

1.07 (0.93-1.23)

1.09 (0.82-1.47)

0.82 (0.51-1.31)

0.63 (0.32-1.24)

 

p for interaction

0.04

0.12

0.05

0.08

Smoking status

Never

1.18 (1.00-1.39)

1.29 (0.90-1.85)

1.35 (0.78-2.35)

0.79 (0.37-1.70)

 

Former

1.05 (0.90-1.22)

1.02 (0.75-1.39)

0.97 (0.62-1.53)

0.99 (0.50-1.96)

 

Current

1.15 (1.04-1.27)

1.36 (1.11-1.67)

1.13 (0.82-1.56)

1.27 (0.82-1.97)

 

p for interaction

0.94

0.39

0.78

0.22

Pre-existing morbidityc at baseline

No

1.13 (0.99-1.28)

1.43 (1.15-1.79)

1.38 (0.97-1.96)

1.18 (0.74-1.86)

 

Yes

1.15 (1.04-1.26)

1.17 (0.94-1.60)

1.00 (0.72-1.40)

1.09 (0.66-1.79)

 

p for interaction

0.79

0.13

0.13

0.79

aPer doubling of NO2 concentration. Adjusted for sex, age (age was the time scale), calendar year, employment status, school attendance, occupation with potential exposure to smoke and fumes, smoking status, smoking intensity, smoking duration, environmental tobacco smoke, alcohol intake, fat, fish, fruit and vegetables, fiber, folate, body mass index, waist circumference, physical activity with sport, hormone replacement therapy, average gross income of municipality of residence in 1995 and noise at the baseline address. The Cox model stratified for marital status.

bIdentical to estimates in the last column of Table2; shown here for comparison.

cMyocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia or diabetes mellitus. The model included adjustment for main effects of pre-existing morbidity.

NO2 concentration at the residences since 1971, without log-transformation, was associated with a 16% (95% CI, 3–31%) higher cardiovascular mortality rate and an 8% (95% CI, 1–14%) higher all-cause mortality rate per 10 μg/m3 NO2 ( Additional file5:Table S4).

Frailty models with municipality included as a random effect indicated area level confounding for all cause but not for cardiovascular mortality ( Additional file6: Table S5).

Discussion

We found associations between long-term measures of traffic-related air pollution at the residence and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all causes, in agreement with previous studies[19]. Adjustment for road traffic noise attenuated the estimated MRRs, but associations with NO2 concentration remained. The association between NO2 and mortality was strongest for people with the lowest intake of fruit and vegetables and weakest (or absent) for people with the highest intake.

The strengths of this study include a 13-year prospective follow-up of a large cohort and adjustment for road traffic noise and other potential confounders. Follow-up for cause-specific mortality and vital status was possible through nationwide population-based registries. Further, exposure assessment at individual addresses allowed detection of within-city contrasts, which might be more strongly associated with cardiovascular events than between-city contrasts[23, 24]. The model used to calculate NO2 concentrations at addresses requires comprehensive input data and has been validated[1921] and applied[2527]. Although model-based estimates of air pollution concentrations are inevitably somewhat uncertain, any resulting non-differential misclassification would create artificial associations only in rare situations[28]. The data on mortality were from the Danish Registry of Causes of Death, and the underlying cause of death was defined from information on death certificates[17]. A validation study showed that the Danish Registry of Causes of Death has a predictive value of 70% and a sensitivity of 81% for death due to acute myocardial infarction[29]. Misclassification of the underlying cause of death is unlikely to be associated with air pollution levels and would change the MRRs towards 1.00 rather than create artificial associations. Personal characteristics of the participants were collected at baseline. Some factors (e.g. smoking duration and intensity, educational level and HRT use) covered the whole life until baseline; others covered a shorter period (e.g. dietary habits which covered the last year before baseline); and others (such as BMI and waist circumference) referred to one point in time (baseline). It is uncertain to which degree the collected information covers also the time after baseline and for e.g. diet and BMI also the time many years before baseline. The study population was between 50 and 64 years old at baseline, and lifestyle at these ages are usually relatively stable and representative for the decades before and after. However, participants who developed a disease after baseline might indeed have changed lifestyle, which might cause misclassification when using baseline characteristics.

Previous studies of NO2 and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all causes have shown both stronger[3, 8, 14, 30], similar[4, 8, 31, 32] and weaker[2, 8, 9] associations than this study when comparing effect estimates corresponding to 10 μg/m3 NO2. The differences might be due to different methods or differences in the air pollution mixture for which NO2 is a marker. The confidence intervals of the present study overlap widely with those of corresponding results from the previous studies indicating that chance might also explain the differences.

Several risk factors for mortality, such as length of school attendance, smoking and physical activity, were associated with NO2 levels at the residence, and adjustment for these (and other) factors reduced the MRRs substantially, as expected. Exposure to road traffic noise is associated with both traffic-related air pollution and cardiovascular health[10] and was therefore also a potential confounder in the present study. Although adjustment for road traffic noise reduced the risk estimates associated with NO2, the effects on mortality from cardiovascular disease and all causes remained. An effect of air pollution on mortality from cardiovascular disease independent of concomitant noise is in line with the results of two recent studies[33, 34].

It is uncertain which period of exposure is relevant for an association between exposure to air pollution and morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease. We found stronger associations of mortality from all cardiovascular disease with exposure since 1971 and 1991 than with 1-year average exposure at the baseline address, although the difference was small. This might indicate the relevance of decades of exposure, perhaps explained by effects of air pollution on the chronic process of atherogenesis[13] or other mechanisms of importance for the development of cardiovascular diseases[11]. Our study addressed long-term exposure; however, people living in highly polluted areas are probably also more likely to be exposed to high peak exposures. Strong correlations (r s between 0.87 and 0.95) for NO2 over the three periods precluded a more detailed analysis of the effect of timing of exposure in the present study.

In contrast to our findings with modeled NO2 at residences, we found no significant associations with indicators of traffic at the residence. This difference might be due to the fact that the air pollution model takes into account a number of factors of relevance for the air pollution concentration (such as street width, building geometry, amount, type, speed and emission factors of traffic, background contributions), providing a more precise assessment of air pollution than the simple traffic counts used for the traffic indicators. Previous studies have shown associations with simple traffic indicators, however without adjustment for road traffic noise[2, 6, 35, 36]. Post-hoc analyses without adjustment for noise showed associations between the simple traffic indicators and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all causes ( Additional file7: Table S6). Thus, when NO2 and noise were assessed in state-of-the art exposure models with extensive input data of similar quality, significant associations were found between NO2 concentration and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all causes also after adjustment for road traffic noise. When the simple, less precise proxy measures of air pollution, traffic indicators, were adjusted for the more precisely determined street noise levels, the estimated effect of traffic might be ‘over-adjusted’.

We adjusted for noise at the baseline address even when estimating effects of air pollution over much longer time periods, because noise calculations were not available at all addresses since 1971. This might imply insufficient adjustment for noise, i.e. residual confounding. However, the results also showed a significant effect of air pollution after adjustment for noise when estimating both air pollution and noise at the baseline address and restricting to cohort participants who lived at the same address from baseline onwards ( Additional file3: Table S2).

Dietary intake of fruit and vegetables modified the association between NO2 and mortality, so that the association was strongest for people with a low intake of fruit and vegetables and weakest (or absent) among people with a high intake. This is in line with a case-crossover study of short-term effects of air pollution, which showed the strongest effects on mortality among those with a low intake of fruit and vegetables[12]. We found associations between NO2 concentration and mortality; NO2 is not only an airway irritant but also an indicator of vehicle engine exhaust, which is a complex mixture of many chemicals, including particulate matter with absorbed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, quinones, transition metals and other substances. Thus, associations observed between NO2 and cardiovascular diseases might be caused by multiple of these correlated substances, which in general can cause oxidative stress and inflammation, which in turn can promote cardiovascular disease mechanisms including short-term related endothelial dysfunction, plaque rupture, thrombogenecity and autonomic imbalance and long-term related atherosclerosis progression, plague instability, insulin resistance and dyslipidemia[11, 13, 37, 38]. A possible mechanism for a protective effect of fruit and vegetables that are rich in antioxidants and related compounds is scavenging of free radicals and reactive oxygen species generated by exposure to air pollution before they can affect vascular function, oxidize lipids and activate proinflammatory, prothrombotic and other relevant pathways as well as up-regulation of protective enzymes[3942]. Although a single previous study supports this hypothesis[2], we cannot exclude the possibility that the interaction between intake of fruit and vegetables and mortality from cardiovascular disease observed in this study is a chance finding. Also, a high intake of fruit and vegetables might be an indicator of a generally healthy lifestyle, and the apparent effect modification by fruit and vegetables might be due to other characteristics that were not sufficiently adjusted for in our study. However, the ‘dose–response’ association for three levels of fruit and vegetable intake, the consistency by end-point and biological plausibility speak in favor of a true interaction.

We did not find stronger associations between air pollution and mortality among cohort members with a previous diagnosis of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia or diabetes mellitus, in line with previous results[8, 9, 24]. This result, with the finding that adjustment for pre-existing morbidity had virtually no effect on MRRs, indicates that death due to air pollution does not affect only susceptible people with pre-existing cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus and that the underlying biological mechanisms of long-term air pollution exposure are general and affect large populations. These conclusions are in line with recent proposals that air pollution promotes the life-long process of atherogenesis and that underlying subclinical atherosclerosis increases the pool of people prone to ‘events’[13, 43].

A previous study indicated a stronger association between air pollution and mortality among women than among men[32], but the results of our and other studies show no such sex difference[4, 8, 9, 44]. Some studies indicated stronger associations between air pollution and cardiovascular events among people with a high body mass index[24, 45], which was not confirmed in the present or another study[8]. Two studies suggested that air pollution had the strongest effects on all-cause mortality among people with the lowest educational level[2, 44], but our and other studies did not confirm this for all causes[30] or for cardiovascular events[4, 24]. Some[2, 44, 45] but not other studies[8, 24, 30, 46] showed stronger effects of air pollution among people who had never smoked; however, we found no effect modification by smoking status.

Our results show associations between NO2 concentration and mortality from ‘other’ cardiovascular diseases, covering a heterogeneous variety of relatively rare causes of death. In view of the large number of other causes of death, the few deaths from each cause and the lack of an a priori hypothesis, we abstained from an explorative analysis for this subgroup.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this cohort study shows associations between traffic-related air pollution at residential addresses over several decades and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all causes, after adjustment for road traffic noise and other potential confounders. The association between air pollution and mortality was strongest for people with a low intake of fruit and vegetables, which needs confirmation in future studies.

Abbreviations

CI: 

Confidence Interval

GIS: 

Geographical Information System

ICD: 

International Classification of Diseases

MRR: 

Mortality Rate Ratio

OSPM: 

Operational Street Pollution Model

rs

Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Kristin Miller for fruitful discussions on methodological aspects and Martin Hvidberg for geocoding addresses and calculating the traffic variables. The project was supported by the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation, as part of the Danish Centre of Excellence on Air Pollution and Health, AIRPOLIFE (grant 2052-03-0016), and by the Danish Cancer Society. The funding sources had no role in any aspect of the research process.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Danish Cancer Society Research Center
(2)
Department of Public Health, Center for Epidemiology and Screening, University of Copenhagen
(3)
Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University
(4)
Department of Public Health, Section of Environmental Health, University of Copenhagen
(5)
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Aarhus University

References

  1. Nafstad P, Haheim LL, Wisloff T, Gram F, Oftedal B, Holme I, Hjermann I, Leren P: Urban air pollution and mortality in a cohort of Norwegian men. Environ Health Perspect. 2004, 112: 610-615. 10.1289/ehp.6684.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Beelen R, Hoek G, van den Brandt PA, Goldbohm RA, Fischer P, Schouten LJ, Jerrett M, Hughes E, Armstrong B, Brunekreef B: Long-term effects of traffic-related air pollution on mortality in a Dutch cohort (NLCS-AIR study). Environ Health Perspect. 2008, 116: 196-202. 10.1289/ehp.10614.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jerrett M, Finkelstein MM, Brook JR, Arain MA, Kanaroglou P, Stieb DM, Gilbert NL, Verma D, Finkelstein N, Chapman KR, Sears MR: A cohort study of traffic-related air pollution and mortality in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Environ Health Perspect. 2009, 117: 772-777.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Rosenlund M, Bellander T, Nordquist T, Alfredsson L: Traffic-generated air pollution and myocardial infarction. Epidemiology. 2009, 20: 265-271. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318190ea68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Lipfert FW, Wyzga RE, Baty JD, Miller JP: Air pollution and survival within the Washington University-EPRI veterans cohort: risks based on modeled estimates of ambient levels of hazardous and criteria air pollutants. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2009, 59: 473-489.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Gan WQ, Tamburic L, Davies HW, Demers PA, Koehoorn M, Brauer M: Changes in residential proximity to road traffic and the risk of death from coronary heart disease. Epidemiology. 2010, 21: 642-649. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e89f19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ostro B, Lipsett M, Reynolds P, Goldberg D, Hertz A, Garcia C, Henderson KD, Bernstein L: Long-term exposure to constituents of fine particulate air pollution and mortality: results from the California Teachers Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2010, 118: 363-369.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Yorifuji T, Kashima S, Tsuda T, Takao S, Suzuki E, Doi H, Sugiyama M, Ishikawa-Takata K, Ohta T: Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and mortality in Shizuoka, Japan. Occup Environ Med. 2010, 67: 111-117. 10.1136/oem.2008.045542.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gan WQ, Koehoorn M, Davies HW, Demers PA, Tamburic L, Brauer M: Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and the risk of coronary heart disease hospitalization and mortality. Environ Health Perspect. 2011, 119: 501-507.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Babisch W: Transportation noise and cardiovascular risk: updated review and synthesis of epidemiological studies indicate that the evidence has increased. Noise Health. 2006, 8: 1-29. 10.4103/1463-1741.32464.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Brook RD, Rajagopalan S, Pope CA, Brook JR, Bhatnagar A, Diez-Roux AV, Holguin F, Hong Y, Luepker RV, Mittleman MA, Peters A, Siscovick D, Smith SC, Whitsel L, Kaufman JD: Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010, 121: 2331-2378. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ou CQ, Wong CM, Ho SY, Schooling M, Yang L, Hedley AJ, Lam TH: Dietary habits and the short-term effects of air pollution on mortality in the Chinese population in Hong Kong. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012, 66: 254-258. 10.1136/jech.2009.103275.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kunzli N, Perez L, von Klot S, Baldassarre D, Bauer M, Basagana X, Breton C, Dratva J, Elosua R, de Faire U, Fuks K, de Groot E, Marrugat J, Penell J, Seissler J, Peters A, Hoffmann B: Investigating air pollution and atherosclerosis in humans: concepts and outlook. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2011, 53: 334-343. 10.1016/j.pcad.2010.12.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Gehring U, Heinrich J, Kramer U, Grote V, Hochadel M, Sugiri D, Kraft M, Rauchfuss K, Eberwein HG, Wichmann HE: Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and cardiopulmonary mortality in women. Epidemiology. 2006, 17: 545-551. 10.1097/01.ede.0000224541.38258.87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Rosenlund M, Berglind N, Pershagen G, Hallqvist J, Jonson T, Bellander T: Long-term exposure to urban air pollution and myocardial infarction. Epidemiology. 2006, 17: 383-390. 10.1097/01.ede.0000219722.25569.0f.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Tjonneland A, Olsen A, Boll K, Stripp C, Christensen J, Engholm G, Overvad K: Study design, exposure variables, and socioeconomic determinants of participation in Diet, Cancer and Health: a population-based prospective cohort study of 57,053 men and women in Denmark. Scand J Public Health. 2007, 35: 432-441. 10.1080/14034940601047986.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Helweg-Larsen K: The Danish Register of Causes of Death. Scand J Public Health. 2011, 39: 26-29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen SS, Berkowicz R, Hansen SH, Hertel O: A Danish decision-support GIS tool for management of urban air quality and human exposures. Transport Res Part D: Transport Environ. 2001, 6: 229-241. 10.1016/S1361-9209(00)00026-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Raaschou-Nielsen O, Hertel O, Vignati E, Berkowicz R, Jensen SS, Larsen VB, Lohse C, Olsen JH: An air pollution model for use in epidemiological studies: evaluation with measured levels of nitrogen dioxide and benzene. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2000, 10: 4-14. 10.1038/sj.jea.7500070.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Berkowicz R, Ketzel M, Jensen SS, Hvidberg M, Raaschou-Nielsen O: Evaluation and application of OSPM for traffic pollution assessment for large number of street locations. Environ Model Software. 2008, 23: 296-303. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.04.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ketzel M, Berkowicz R, Hvidberg M, Jensen SS, Raaschou-Nielsen O: Evaluation of AIRGIS – a GIS-based air pollution and human exposure modelling system. Int J Environ Pollut. 2011, 47: 226-238. 10.1504/IJEP.2011.047337.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Sorensen M, Hvidberg M, Andersen ZJ, Nordsborg RB, Lillelund KG, Jakobsen J, Tjonneland A, Overvad K, Raaschou-Nielsen O: Road traffic noise and stroke: a prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2011, 32: 737-744. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq466.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Jerrett M, Burnett RT, Ma R, Pope CA, Krewski D, Newbold KB, Thurston G, Shi Y, Finkelstein N, Calle EE, Thun MJ: Spatial analysis of air pollution and mortality in Los Angeles. Epidemiology. 2005, 16: 727-736. 10.1097/01.ede.0000181630.15826.7d.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller KA, Siscovick DS, Sheppard L, Shepherd K, Sullivan JH, Anderson GL, Kaufman JD: Long-term exposure to air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med. 2007, 356: 447-458. 10.1056/NEJMoa054409.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Raaschou-Nielsen O, Andersen ZJ, Hvidberg M, Jensen SS, Ketzel M, Sørensen M, Loft S, Overvad K, Tjonneland A: Lung cancer incidence and long-term exposure to air pollution from traffic. Environ Health Perspect. 2011, 119: 860-865. 10.1289/ehp.1002353.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Andersen ZJ, Hvidberg M, Jensen SS, Ketzel M, Loft S, Sorensen M, Tjonneland A, Overvad K, Raaschou-Nielsen O: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Long-Term Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution: A Cohort Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011, 183: 455-461. 10.1164/rccm.201006-0937OC.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Raaschou-Nielsen O, Andersen ZJ, Hvidberg M, Jensen SS, Ketzel M, Sorensen M, Hansen J, Loft S, Overvad K, Tjonneland A: Air pollution from traffic and cancer incidence: a Danish cohort study. Environ Health. 2011, 10: 67-10.1186/1476-069X-10-67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Dosemeci M, Wacholder S, Lubin JH: Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value?. Am J Epidemiol. 1990, 132: 746-748.Google Scholar
  29. Madsen M, Davidsen M, Rasmussen S, Abildstrom SZ, Osler M: The validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in routine statistics: a comparison of mortality and hospital discharge data with the Danish MONICA registry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003, 56: 124-130. 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00591-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Filleul L, Rondeau V, Vandentorren S, Le Moual N, Cantagrel A, Annesi-Maesano I, Charpin D, Declercq C, Neukirch F, Paris C, Vervloet D, Brochard P, Tessier JF, Kauffmann F, Baldi I: Twenty five year mortality and air pollution: results from the French PAARC survey. Occup Environ Med. 2005, 62: 453-460. 10.1136/oem.2004.014746.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenlund M, Picciotto S, Forastiere F, Stafoggia M, Perucci CA: Traffic-related air pollution in relation to incidence and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Epidemiology. 2008, 19: 121-128. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31815c1921.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Chen LH, Knutsen SF, Shavlik D, Beeson WL, Petersen F, Ghamsary M, Abbey D: The association between fatal coronary heart disease and ambient particulate air pollution: Are females at greater risk?. Environ Health Perspect. 2005, 113: 1723-1729. 10.1289/ehp.8190.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Beelen R, Hoek G, Houthuijs D, van den Brandt PA, Goldbohm RA, Fischer P, Schouten LJ, Armstrong B, Brunekreef B: The joint association of air pollution and noise from road traffic with cardiovascular mortality in a cohort study. Occup Environ Med. 2009, 66: 243-250.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Selander J, Nilsson ME, Bluhm G, Rosenlund M, Lindqvist M, Nise G, Pershagen G: Long-term exposure to road traffic noise and myocardial infarction. Epidemiology. 2009, 20: 272-279. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31819463bd.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Schikowski T, Sugiri D, Ranft U, Gehring U, Heinrich J, Wichmann HE, Kramer U: Does respiratory health contribute to the effects of long-term air pollution exposure on cardiovascular mortality?. Respir Res. 2007, 8: 20-10.1186/1465-9921-8-20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Kan H, Heiss G, Rose KM, Whitsel EA, Lurmann F, London SJ: Prospective analysis of traffic exposure as a risk factor for incident coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Environ Health Perspect. 2008, 116: 1463-1468. 10.1289/ehp.11290.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Delfino RJ, Sioutas C, Malik S: Potential role of ultrafine particles in associations between airborne particle mass and cardiovascular health. Environ Health Perspect. 2005, 113: 934-946. 10.1289/ehp.7938.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Moller P, Jacobsen NR, Folkmann JK, Danielsen PH, Mikkelsen L, Hemmingsen JG, Vesterdal LK, Forchhammer L, Wallin H, Loft S: Role of oxidative damage in toxicity of particulates. Free Radic Res. 2010, 44: 1-46. 10.3109/10715760903300691.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Dauchet L, Amouyel P, Dallongeville J: Fruits, vegetables and coronary heart disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009, 6: 599-608. 10.1038/nrcardio.2009.131.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Kelly FJ: Dietary antioxidants and environmental stress. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004, 63: 579-585. 10.1079/PNS2004388.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Moller P, Loft S: Dietary antioxidants and beneficial effect on oxidatively damaged DNA. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006, 41: 388-415. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.04.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Romieu I, Castro-Giner F, Kunzli N, Sunyer J: Air pollution, oxidative stress and dietary supplementation: a review. Eur Respir J. 2008, 31: 179-197. 10.1183/09031936.00128106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Kunzli N: Is air pollution of the 20th century a cause of current asthma hospitalisations?. Thorax. 2012, 67: 2-3. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200919.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Pope CA, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, Ito K, Thurston GD: Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA. 2002, 287: 1132-1141. 10.1001/jama.287.9.1132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Puett RC, Schwartz J, Hart JE, Yanosky JD, Speizer FE, Suh H, Paciorek CJ, Neas LM, Laden F: Chronic particulate exposure, mortality, and coronary heart disease in the nurses' health study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008, 168: 1161-1168. 10.1093/aje/kwn232.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Puett RC, Hart JE, Suh H, Mittleman M, Laden F: Particulate Matter Exposures, Mortality, and Cardiovascular Disease in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2011, 119: 1130-1135. 10.1289/ehp.1002921.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Raaschou-Nielsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

Advertisement