The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure
© Knol et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 10 December 2009
Accepted: 26 April 2010
Published: 26 April 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Dec 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jerome Ravetz|
|17 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Denis Loveridge|
|20 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Burgman|
|11 Feb 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Anne Knol|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Feb 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Denis Loveridge|
|17 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Anne Knol|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Anne Knol|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Apr 2010||Editorially accepted|
|26 Apr 2010||Article published||10.1186/1476-069X-9-19|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.