Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Ancient water bottle use and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) exposure among California Indians: a prehistoric health risk assessment

Environmental Health201716:61

DOI: 10.1186/s12940-017-0261-1

Received: 15 December 2016

Accepted: 17 May 2017

Published: 23 June 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carl Wendt
21 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - D. Sarigiannis
13 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sabrina Sholts
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
17 May 2017 Editorially accepted
23 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12940-017-0261-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution
(2)
Center for Experimental Archaeology at Davis (CEAD), Department of Anthropology, University of California
(3)
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University
(4)
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University
(5)
UCLA/Getty Conservation Programme, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, UCLA

Advertisement