Area-aggregated assessments of perceived environmental attributes may overcome single-source bias in studies of green environments and health: results from a cross-sectional survey in southern Sweden
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Apr 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sjerp de Vries|
|25 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Sick Nielsen|
|4 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Groenewegen|
|11 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Kim de Jong|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Groenewegen|
|11 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sjerp de Vries|
|24 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Kim de Jong|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jan 2011||Editorially accepted|
|17 Jan 2011||Article published||10.1186/1476-069X-10-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.