Skip to main content

Table 1 Distribution of nitrate concentration in US Geological Survey wells by aquifer type and categories of land use in Lancaster, Lebanon, and Chester Counties, from 1976-2006

From: Modeled nitrate levels in well water supplies and prevalence of abnormal thyroid conditions among the Old Order Amish in Pennsylvania

Well Location

Nitrate mg/L (NO3-N)

Aquifer

N

Median

Mean

Std. Dev.

Minimum

Maximum

Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystaline-rock

1676

3.00

4.35

4.88

< .002

52.00

Piedmont and Blue Ridge carbonate rock

1093

6.03

7.88

7.43

0.020

95.50

Early mesozoic basin

469

3.77

4.96

5.28

< .002

45.00

Valley and ridge carbonate rock

241

11.00

13.60

13.39

< .002

90.00

Valley and ridge

134

1.02

2.12

2.86

0.010

16.64

Land use 1992

N

Median

Mean

Std. Dev.

Minimum

Maximum

Pasture

1756

5.00

6.89

7.37

< .002

90.00

Deciduous forest

674

2.15

3.60

4.46

0.003

45.00

Row crop

399

6.91

9.24

10.79

0.020

95.50

Low intensity residential

289

3.68

4.49

4.91

0.003

52.00

Mixed forest

173

2.50

3.81

3.84

< .002

20.80

Commercial or industrial

130

4.94

5.76

4.66

0.020

22.10

Evergreen forest

121

3.63

4.85

4.37

0.003

21.50

High intensity residential

21

5.95

5.09

2.47

0.690

9.23

Water

17

3.72

4.61

5.39

0.020

22.00

Quarry mine gravel pit

15

0.80

2.02

3.69

0.150

15.00

Transitional

11

1.78

2.34

1.81

0.190

6.13

Urban grasses

4

5.39

4.86

2.68

1.420

7.26

Woody wetland

3

2.48

6.22

8.45

0.280

15.90

Overall

3613

4.12

6.03

7.1

< .002

95.5

  1. Spatial classification is based on the National Land Cover Data Set; 1992, USGS [ref 38].