Table 6 Percentage change in CAC* for pollutant IQR increases by analysis model and exposure estimation approach
| Â | PM2.5* | EC* | OC* | Silicon | Sulfur |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | % Change (95% CI) | % Change (95% CI) | % Change (95% CI) | % Change (95% CI) | % Change (95% CI) |
Model 1** | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   Nearest Monitor | −1.52 (−3.31,0.26) | −1.65 (−3.54,0.24) | −0.59 (−3.14,1.96) | −3.96 (−8.62,0.70) | 0.61 (−1.67,2.89) |
   IDW | −1.00 (−2.21,0.21) | −1.26 (−2.76,0.24) | −0.61 (−2.29,1.08) | −3.14 (−6.09,-0.19) | 0.70 (−1.68,3.08) |
   City-Wide Average | −0.85 (−2.02,0.32) | −1.11 (−2.52,0.30) | 0.19 (−1.32,1.70) | −3.41 (−6.36,-0.45) | 0.66 (−1.76,3.07) |
Model 2** | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   Nearest Monitor | −1.56 (−3.34,0.21) | −1.61 (−3.49,0.27) | −0.98 (−3.52,1.57) | −3.08 (−7.73,1.58) | 0.05 (−2.22,2.33) |
   IDW | −1.03 (−2.23,0.17) | −1.22 (−2.71,0.28) | −0.86 (−2.54,0.83) | −2.52 (−5.47,0.43) | 0.12 (−2.25,2.50) |
   City-Wide Average | −0.63 (−1.84,0.58) | −0.83 (−2.28,0.63) | 0.13 (−1.44,1.70) | −3.66 (−6.71,-0.61) | 1.13 (−1.34,3.60) |
Model 3** | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   Nearest Monitor | −1.37 (−3.22,0.48) | −1.43 (−3.37,0.52) | −0.86 (−3.51,1.78) | −3.35 (−8.18,1.47) | 0.58 (−1.76,2.92) |
   IDW | −0.89 (−2.14,0.37) | −1.06 (−2.61,0.49) | −0.90 (−2.67,0.86) | −3.07 (−6.13,0.00) | 0.67 (−1.77,3.12 |
   City-Wide Average | −0.72 (−1.94,0.49) | −0.90 (−2.36,0.57) | −0.05 (−1.63,1.53) | −3.21 (−6.27,-0.14) | 0.64 (−1.85,3.12) |
Model 4** | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   Nearest Monitor | −3.10 (−8.08,1.89) | −3.40 (−8.76,1.97) | −1.05 (−8.03,5.93) | 4.13 (−5.43,13.68) | −2.32 (−16.91,12.27) |
   IDW | −3.78 (−8.75,1.19) | −5.42 (−12.52,1.69) | *** | 3.24 (−8.59,15.07) | 8.51 (−24.75,41.77) |