Reference | Database used | Distribution parameters | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Sheehan et al. 1990 [70] | |||
Interspecies variation | Ratios of tumour incidences (TD50s) for 190 chemicals in mice and rats | Median = 2.6 | |
Intraspecies variation | Ratios of acute lethality (LD50s) for adult and newborn mammals for 238 chemicals | Median = 2.4 | |
Overall assessment | Values exceeding 100: 11.8% predicted, 10% observed | ||
Baird et al. 1996 [107] | |||
Interspecies variation | 69 pesticides tested in different animal species, allometrically adjusted for body surface (Dourson et al. 1992) | Median = AS1 | |
GSD = 5 | |||
Intraspecies variation | Probit dose–response slopes from 490 acute lethality experiments using rats [75], assuming two different levels of protection; | Basic approach: | |
Median = 2.7 | |||
GSD = 2.3 | |||
Basic approach: 1/100,000 | Alternative approach: | ||
Alternative approach: 1/1,000 | Median = 5.3 | ||
GSD = 1.4 | |||
Overall assessment | RfDs or RfCs for 126 compounds with NOAELs from chronic bioassays in IRIS database | Basic approach: | Fraction of RfDs within the lower 5% of distribution of potential threshold values2 ; |
Median = AS x 3 | All: 56% | ||
P95 = AS x 50 | Mice: 23% | ||
P99 = AS x 220 | Rats: 39% | ||
Alternative approach: | Dogs: 98% | ||
Median = AS x 5 | |||
P95 = AS x 63 | |||
P99 = AS x 194 | |||
Interspecies variation | 184 substances tested in mice, rats and dogs | GM = AS | Factor 12 (4 for allometric scaling x 3 for remaining uncertainty) coincides with 73rd percentile. |
GSD = 4.5 | |||
P95 = AS x 19 | |||
P99 = AS x 65 | |||
Intraspecies variation | Theoretical, to be consistent with default factor 10, P99 = 10 [108] | Median = 1 + 3 | |
GSD = 1.6 | |||
Overall assessment | GM = AS x 4 | Percentile of the default factor 100: 79% (NOAEL in mouse), 88% (NOAEL in rat)3 | |
GSD = 4.7 | |||
P95 = AS x 53 | |||
Gaylor and Kodell 2000 [109] | |||
Interspecies variation | Binary aquatic interspecies comparisons from dozens to over 500 agents [72] | Median = 1 | |
GSD = 1.66 | |||
Intraspecies variation | Probit dose–response slopes from 490 acute lethality experiments using rats [75] adapted by Dourson and Stara [31] | Median = 1 | Default value of 10 corresponds to the 92nd percentile |
GSD = 1.64 | |||
Overall assessment | Median = 1 | ||
GSD = 2.33 | |||
P95 = 46 | |||
P99 = 230 | |||
Schneider et al. 2005 [106] | |||
Interspecies variation | 63 antineoplastic agents in humans and five different animal species [68] | GM = AS x 0.97 | |
GSD = 3.45 | |||
P95 = AS x 6.7 | |||
P99 = AS x 15 | |||
Intraspecies variation | Human database for predominantly healthy adults developed by Hattis et al. [79] | GM = 3.8 | |
GSD = 4.3 | |||
P95 = 44 | |||
P99 = 117 | |||
Overall assessment | Our own calculation | GM = AS x 3.7 | Proportion of substances for which the default factor 100 would not be exceeded: |
GSD = 5.4 | AS based on caloric demand; 76% (mouse), 85% (rat) | ||
P95 = AS x 82 | AS based on surface area; 64% (mouse), 79% (rat) | ||
P99 = AS x 295 | |||
Hasegawa et al. 2010 [110] | |||
Interspecies variation | 63 antineoplastic agents in humans and five different animal species adapted from [68] | GM = AS | |
GSD = 3.23 | |||
P95 = 48.2 (mice) | |||
P95 = 27.5 (rats) | |||
Intraspecies variation | Rat young/newborn NOAEL ratios for 18 industrial chemicals [98] | GM = 3 | |
GSD = 1.38 | |||
P95 = 5.09 | |||
Overall assessment | P95 = 155 (mice) | ||
P95 = 88.7 (rats) |