| |
β-HCH
|
β-HCH
|
β-HCH
|
|---|
|
(Area 1–4)
|
(Area 4)
|
(Area 1–3)
|
|---|
| |
GMR
|
95%CI
|
GMR
|
95%CI
|
GMR
|
95%CI
|
|---|
|
Sex
|
|
Males
|
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
|
Females
|
1.20
|
0.98-1.47
|
1.17
|
0.84-1.65
|
1.30
|
1.03-1.63
|
|
Age group (years)
|
|
25-34
|
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
|
35-44
|
1.34
|
0.99-1.80
|
1.28
|
0.77-2.13
|
1.56
|
1.12-2.17
|
|
45-54
|
1.92
|
1.40-2.62
|
1.56
|
0.94-2.58
|
2.48
|
1.75-3.53
|
|
55-64
|
2.76
|
2.04-3.74
|
2.51
|
1.52-4.13
|
3.51
|
2.49-4.95
|
|
Level of Education
|
|
Primary school
|
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
|
Secondary school
|
0.78
|
0.62-0.98
|
0.81
|
0.54- 1.21
|
0.81
|
0.64-1.02
|
|
University degree
|
0.86
|
0.57-1.29
|
0.91
|
0.41-1.99
|
0.93
|
0.63-1.37
|
|
Area of residence*
|
|
Area 1
|
1.00
| | | | | |
|
Area 2
|
0.98
|
0.68-1.41
| | | | |
|
Area 3
|
1.32
|
0.91-1.93
| | | | |
|
Area 4
|
2.00
|
1.36-2.94
| | | | |
|
Any use of well water
|
|
No
|
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
|
Yes
|
1.42
|
1.08-1.88
|
1.46
|
0.97-2.20
|
1.42
|
0.97-2.08
|
|
Provenience of food§
|
|
Commercial
|
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
|
Local
|
1.16
|
0.89-1.52
|
1.75
|
0.97-3.18
|
1.00
|
0.78-1.29
|
|
Own production
|
1.26
|
0.94-1.69
|
2.27
|
1.24-4.13
|
0.75
|
0.55-1.01
|
|
Consume of Beef§
|
|
None/commercial
|
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
|
Local
|
0.91
|
0.61-1.35
|
0.84
|
0.50-1.43
|
0.81
|
0.36-1.83
|
|
Own production
|
1.88
|
1.35-2.63
|
1.67
|
1.09-2.57
|
dropped
|
|
Consume of Chickens§
|
|
None/commercial
|
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
1.00
| |
|
Local
|
1.08
|
0.72-1.60
|
1.06
|
0.56- 1.98
|
1.33
|
0.73-2.43
|
|
Own production
|
1.36
|
0.99-1.85
|
1.63
|
1.04-2.55
|
0.67
|
0.36-1.83
|
- *Area 1: reference; Area 2: Colleferro urban/rural; Area 3: industrial; Area 4: river.
- GMR: Geometric Mean Ratio from multivariate linear regression model.
- 95%CI: 95% Confidence Intervals.
- § the model with the variables consume of beef and consume of chicken is alternative to the model with the variable provenience of food.
