Skip to main content

Table 1 The relationships between the subjective evaluation results (both HR and CR) and acoustical parameters

From: Annoyance and activity disturbance induced by high-speed railway and conventional railway noise: a contrastive case study

Acoustical parameters

A

R 2

D

R 2

L Aeq

A = 1.986L Aeq-75.46a

0.839

D = 1.968L Aeq-79.59a

0.816

SEL

A = 1.986 SEL-134.1a

0.839

D = 1.968 SEL-137.7a

0.816

L AFmax

A = 1.873L AFmax-88.63a

0.942

D = 1.852L AFmax-92.38a

0.913

L ASmax

A = 1.939L ASmax-84.86a

0.884

D = 1.917L ASmax-88.58a

0.856

L A10

A = 1.964L A10-63.40a

0.653

D = 1.989L A10-70.19a

0.663

L EPN

A = 1.886L EPN-116.9b

0.711

D = 1.857L EPN-119.5b

0.683

L N

A = 12.15L N-740.5a

0.830

D = 12.34L N-757.9a

0.848

A = 2.218L N-132.3b

0.782

D = 2.177L N-133.9b

0.757

S

A = 171.55S-177.1a

0.707

D = 170.76S-181.3a

0.695

A = 38.62S-16.50b

0.751

D = 38.52S-21.27b

0.752

R

A = -50.91R + 103.4a

0.341

D = -50.06R + 97.23a

0.327

A = 23.36R + 2.172b

0.635

D = 22.98R-1.978b

0.618

F

A = 6009.7 F + 26a

0.496

D = 6183.7 F + 19a

0.520

A = 2294.1 F + 17.87b

0.580

D = 2324 F + 12.48b

0.599

L HC

A = L HC-89.7a

0.991

D = L HC-94.8a

0.977

  1. aover 15 min, bover just 45 s.