Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Mar 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Aug 2004 Author responded Author comments - Matthew Longnecker
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Aug 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Aug 2004 Author responded Author comments - Matthew Longnecker
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Aug 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Sep 2004 Author responded Author comments - Matthew Longnecker
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Sep 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Sep 2004 Author responded Author comments - Matthew Longnecker
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Sep 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
13 Sep 2004 Editorially accepted
13 Sep 2004 Article published 10.1186/1476-069X-3-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement