Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Recreational and occupational field exposure to freshwater cyanobacteria – a review of anecdotal and case reports, epidemiological studies and the challenges for epidemiologic assessment

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 May 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
11 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Ian Stewart
Resubmission - Version 2
11 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Ian Stewart
12 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Lam
Resubmission - Version 3
12 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Spencer Metcalf
30 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Colford
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Jun 2005 Author responded Author comments - Ian Stewart
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Jun 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
3 Nov 2005 Author responded Author comments - Ian Stewart
Resubmission - Version 6
3 Nov 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 6
31 Jan 2006 Author responded Author comments - Ian Stewart
Resubmission - Version 7
31 Jan 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 7
20 Feb 2006 Author responded Author comments - Ian Stewart
Resubmission - Version 8
20 Feb 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 8
17 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Ian Stewart
Resubmission - Version 9
17 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
24 Mar 2006 Editorially accepted
24 Mar 2006 Article published 10.1186/1476-069X-5-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement