Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Concentrations versus amounts of biomarkers in urine: a comparison of approaches to assess pyrethroid exposure

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Aug 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Birger Heinzow
8 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jun Ueyama
9 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Michèle Bouchard
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Birger Heinzow
14 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jun Ueyama
28 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Michèle Bouchard
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Michèle Bouchard
Resubmission - Version 5
31 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
4 Nov 2008 Editorially accepted
4 Nov 2008 Article published 10.1186/1476-069X-7-55

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement