Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Dealing with uncertainties in environmental burden of disease assessment

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Jan 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annette Pruss-Ustun
24 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jerome Ravetz
27 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Briggs
17 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anne Knol
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anne Knol
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anne Knol
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anne Knol
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
24 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Anne Knol
Resubmission - Version 7
24 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
28 Apr 2009 Editorially accepted
28 Apr 2009 Article published 10.1186/1476-069X-8-21

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement