Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Commentary: childhood cancer near nuclear power stations

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Mar 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Küppers
16 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alfred Koerblein
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Ian Fairlie
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alfred Koerblein
6 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Küppers
30 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Ian Fairlie
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Ian Fairlie
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
17 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Ian Fairlie
Resubmission - Version 6
17 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
23 Sep 2009 Editorially accepted
23 Sep 2009 Article published 10.1186/1476-069X-8-43

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement