Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Water quality monitoring records for estimating tap water arsenic and nitrate: a validation study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Oct 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jaymie Meliker
16 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann Aschengrau
17 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jim VanDerslice
14 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Susan Searles Nielsen
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jim VanDerslice
13 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Susan Searles Nielsen
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Susan Searles Nielsen
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Jan 2010 Editorially accepted
28 Jan 2010 Article published 10.1186/1476-069X-9-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement