Skip to main content

Table 1 Enrollment and completion rates of Tiers I, II, and III

From: Study of Use of Products and Exposure-Related Behaviors (SUPERB): study design, methods, and demographic characteristics of cohorts

 

Targeted enrollment; (% recruited northern, central)

Actual enrollment (northern, central)

Full data completion (northern, central)

Only partial data completion (northern, central)

Only minimal data completion (northern, central)

Tier I: year 1 only

  

5 survey elements

3-4 survey elements

1-2 survey elements

 

n = 750

n = 655

n = 580

n = 31

n = 39

 

(26%,32%)

(499, 156)

(87%,95%)

(6%,2%)

(7%,3%)

Tier I: longitudinal (years 1-3)

  

3 years

2 years

≤1 year

 

See above

See above

n = 252

n = 182

n = 221

   

(38%,41%)

(25%,37%)

(37%,22%)

Tier II: 15/18 monthsa

  

15-18 monthly surveys

10-14 monthly surveys

1-9 monthly surveys

 

n = 250

n = 250

95b

26

129

 

(77%,75%)

(186, 64)

(29%,63%)

(11%,9%)

(60%,28%)

Tier III: 8 visits over 4 seasonsb

  

4 collection periodsc

2-3 collection periods

1 collection period

 

n = 40

n = 47

n = 40

n = 4

n = 3

 

(34%,52%)

(30, 17)

(90%,76%)

(7%,12%)

(3%,12%)

  1. a Full completion depended upon timing of enrollment into tier 2 as it was modified from 15 to 18 months.
  2. b Includes participants (n = 53) who attempted to complete surveys but encountered issues with the internet survey.
  3. c Each collection consisted of a set-up visit and a take-down visit at the beginning and end of a week. The goal was for four collection periods across a 16 month period.