Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment results for qualitative relevant studies (n = 3)

From: Communication about environmental health risks: A systematic review

STUDY

Eisenman

et al.[3]

Blanchard

et al.[19]

Perez-Lugo

[20]

S TUDY P URPOSE

Was the purpose and/or research question stated clearly?

Yes

Yes

Yes

L ITERATURE

Was relevant background literature reviewed?

Yes

No

Yes

S TUDY D ESIGN

What was the design?

Grounded theory

Qualitative description

Qualitative description

Was a theoretical perspective identified?

Yes

No

No

Method(s) used:

Interviews

Focus group

Interviews

S AMPLING

Was the process of purposeful selection described?

Yes

No

Yes

Was sampling done until redundancy in data was reached?

Not addressed

Not addressed

Not addressed

Was informed consent obtained?

Yes

Not addressed

Not addressed

D ATA C OLLECTION

D ESCRIPTIVE C LARITY: Clear and complete description of site

No

No

No

Clear and complete description of participants

Yes

No

Yes

Role of researcher and relationship with participants

No

No

No

Identification of assumptions and biases of researcher

No

No

No

P ROCEDURE R IGOUR: Was procedural rigour used in data collection strategies?

Not addressed

Yes

No

D ATA A NALYSIS

A NALYTICAL R IGOUR: Were data analyses inductive?

Yes

Yes

No

A NALYTICAL R IGOUR: Were findings consistent with and reflective of data?

Yes

Yes

Yes

A UDITABILITY: Was decision trial developed?

Yes

Not addressed

No

Was the process of analyzing the data described adequately?

Yes

Yes

No

T HEORETICAL C ONNECTIONS: Did a meaningful picture of the phenomenon under study emerge?

No

No

No

O VERALL R IGOUR: Was there evidence of the four components of trustworthiness?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Credibility

Yes

Yes

No

Transferability

Yes

Yes

No

Dependability

Yes

Yes

No

Confirmability

Yes

Yes

Yes

C ONCLUSIONS AND I MPLICATIONS: Were the conclusions appropriate given the study findings?

Yes

Yes

Yes

DO T he findings contribute to theory development and future practice/research?

Yes

Yes

Yes