Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of multiple regression models predicting log-transformed PBDE serum concentrations (ng/g lipid) a

From: Polybrominated diphenyl ether serum concentrations in a Californian population of children, their parents, and older adults: an exposure assessment study

Effects

BDE-47

BDE-99

BDE-100

BDE-153

BDE-154

BDE-209

N

162

159

160

162

162

158

Intercept

2.67(0.27)**

0.83(0.29)

0.95(0.27)

1.72(0.33)

-2.28(0.79)

-2.44(1.14)

Age class (ref = parents of young children)

  Young children

1.24(0.19)**

1.40(0.21)**

1.38(0.19)**

1.18(0.23)**

2.41(0.57)**

1.16(0.82)

  Older adults

0.32(0.20)

0.11(0.22)

0.24(0.21)

0.21(0.25)

0.47(0.52)

2.31(0.90)*

Floor wipe concentration (pg/cm2)

0.03(0.01)**

0.03(0.01)*

0.12(0.03)**

-0.01(0.02)

0.69(0.25)**

0.01(0.003)*

Frequency of having fast food (ref = never)

  <1 time/week

-0.18(0.24)

-0.02(0.26)

-0.06(0.24)

-0.10(0.29)

1.15(0.66)

-1.05(0.89)

  ≥1 time/week

-0.09(0.24)

-0.04(0.26)

0.12(0.24)

-0.04(0.29)

1.01(0.64)

-1.04(0.92)

Frequency of having pre-packed candy or bakery (ref = never)

  <1 time/week

0.37(0.21)

0.35(0.23)

0.51(0.22)+

0.42(0.25)

0.59(0.54)

1.93(0.88)*

  ≥1 time/week

0.05(0.19)

-0.05(0.21)

0.005(0.19)

0.001(0.23)

-0.32(0.51)

0.36(0.81)

Frequency of eating (time/week)

  dairy (based on dairy fat intake)

-0.02(0.01)

-0.002(0.01)

-0.01(0.01)

-0.01(0.01)

-0.03(0.03)

-0.02(0.04)

  Beef

-0.03(0.05)

-0.06(0.05)

-0.03(0.05)

-0.07(0.06)

0.04(0.13)

0.21(0.19)

  Pork

-0.05(0.06)

-0.08(0.07)

-0.09(0.06)

-0.08(0.07)

-0.46(0.20)*

-0.23(0.36)

  Poultry

0.04(0.04)

0.04(0.04)

-0.002(0.04)

0.001(0.05)

0.05(0.10)

-0.09(0.17)

  canned meat

0.67(0.26)*

0.89(0.27)*

0.55(0.26)+

0.14(0.31)

1.67(0.77)*

-10.05(6.47)

  canned meat entrées

-0.04(0.10)

-0.05(0.11)

0.03(0.10)

-0.03(0.12)

0.94(0.38)*

1.25(0.50)*

  canned fish

0.06(0.13)

-0.002(0.14)

0.06(0.13)

0.19(0.15)

-0.57(0.42)

-0.34(0.60)

  fresh tuna and white ocean fish

0.12(0.10)

0.07(0.11)

0.17(0.10)

0.36(0.12)*

0.33(0.26)

0.68(0.40)

  Salmon

0.05(0.15)

0.20(0.16)

0.06(0.15)

-0.06(0.18)

0.51(0.39)

-0.38(0.63)

  fresh water fish

-0.13(0.18)

-0.08(0.20)

-0.13(0.18)

-0.03(0.22)

-0.58(0.50)

-1.73(1.34)

Variance componentsb: Full Model (Null Model)

Between-household (Level 2)

0.64 (0.92)

0.51 (0.93)

0.59 (0.97)

0.84 (1.07)

  

Within-household (Level 1)

0.15 (0.22)

0.42 (0.42)

0.24 (0.24)

0.34 (0.26)

  

Intra-cluster correlation coefficient

0.81 (0.81)

0.55 (0.69)

0.71 (0.80)

0.71 (0.80)

  

Singer & Willett Pseudo R-squarec

  Household variance component

0.30

0.45

0.38

0.21

  

  Residual error variance component

0.30

0.00

-0.01

-0.29

  

Pseudo R-square

0.30d

0.31d

0.31d

0.12d

0.38e

0.40e

  1. aBDE-47, 99, 100, 153 were analyzed by generalized linear mixed-effect model, and BDE-154 and 209 were analyzed by logistic regression model due to their low detection. Results in top section of table are estimated regression coefficients (and standard error).
  2. bVariance components estimated by restricted maximum likelihood estimates and reported for full model as well as for the so-called null model that contains only random household intercepts and no fixed effects. Intra-cluster correlation coefficient is the ratio of the between-household variance component to the sum of the between- and within-household variance components.
  3. cSinger & Willett Pseudo R-squares describe for each variance component the proportional reduction in the null model variance component attributed to the full model [18].
  4. dR-square for mixed-effects linear regression model are reported as the proportional reduction in mean squared prediction error, using Snijder and Bosker’s estimator for a two-level random-intercepts model (the proportional reduction in the sum of variance components) [19].
  5. eR-square of the logistic regression model is the max-scaled R-square [20].
  6. **p-value < 0.01; *p-value < 0.05; +marginally statistically significant, p = 0.05-0.07