Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Commentary
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Brain matters: from environmental ethics to environmental neuroethics

  • 1, 2Email author,
  • 1, 3,
  • 1,
  • 3 and
  • 1
Environmental Health201615:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0114-3

Received: 7 September 2015

Accepted: 4 February 2016

Published: 15 February 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth McDermott-Levy
22 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Grossman
7 Dec 2015 Author responded Author comments - Laura Cabrera
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Dec 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Grossman
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
4 Feb 2016 Editorially accepted
15 Feb 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12940-016-0114-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Core for Neuroethics, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
(2)
Center for Ethics & Humanities in the Life Sciences, Department of Translational Science and Molecular Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
(3)
Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Advertisement