Skip to content

Advertisement

Environmental Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Use of a modified GreenScreen tool to conduct a screening-level comparative hazard assessment of conventional silver and two forms of nanosilver

Environmental Health201615:105

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0188-y

Received: 25 May 2016

Accepted: 26 October 2016

Published: 8 November 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Hurt
9 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Keld Jensen
30 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Sass
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Hurt
21 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Sass
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
26 Oct 2016 Editorially accepted
8 Nov 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12940-016-0188-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Natural Resources Defense Council and George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington DC, USA
(2)
Northwest Green Chemistry and Lauren Heine Group LLC, Spokane, USA
(3)
Green Seal, Washington, USA

Advertisement