This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Use of a modified GreenScreen tool to conduct a screening-level comparative hazard assessment of conventional silver and two forms of nanosilver
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 25 May 2016
Accepted: 26 October 2016
Published: 8 November 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 May 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Hurt|
|9 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Keld Jensen|
|30 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jennifer Sass|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Hurt|
|21 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jennifer Sass|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Oct 2016||Editorially accepted|
|8 Nov 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12940-016-0188-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.