Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Commentary
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Meeting report: the 5th International expert symposium in Fukushima on radiation and health

  • 1Email author,
  • 2 and
  • 1, 3
Environmental Health201716:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0211-y

Received: 15 November 2016

Accepted: 11 January 2017

Published: 18 January 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Naburo Takamura
19 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - DA Bazyka
20 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Vladimir Saenko
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Vladimir Saenko
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
11 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
18 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12940-017-0211-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiation Molecular Epidemiology, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
(2)
Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
(3)
Radiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan

Advertisement