Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of methods for calculating the health costs of endocrine disrupters: a case study on triclosan

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Douglas Crawford-Brown
28 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ingrid Rijk
2 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Radka Prichystalova
Resubmission - Version 2
2 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Douglas Crawford-Brown
25 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ingrid Rijk
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
26 May 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12940-017-0265-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement