This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparison of methods for calculating the health costs of endocrine disrupters: a case study on triclosan
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 24 August 2016
Accepted: 26 May 2017
Published: 9 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Douglas Crawford-Brown|
|28 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingrid Rijk|
|2 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Radka Prichystalova|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Douglas Crawford-Brown|
|25 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingrid Rijk|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|9 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12940-017-0265-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.