Skip to main content

Table 2 Relative risk of various non-Chornobyl radiation-related factors on risk of micronucleus prevalence (after exclusion of 6 cancer cases)

From: Buccal mucosa micronuclei counts in relation to exposure to low dose-rate radiation from the Chornobyl nuclear accident and other medical and occupational radiation exposures

Relative risk category

Relative risk (95% CI)

p-value (for heterogeneity unless otherwise stated)

Work as industrial radiographer

Ever vs never + unknown

6.19 (0.90, 31.08)

0.0729

Has subject ever worked with radiation (apart from Chornobyl)

Ever vs never + unknown

1.68 (0.68, 4.03)

0.2584

Has subject ever worked with radiation in the nuclear industry (including nuclear power plant, apart from work in Chornobyl area)

Ever vs never + unknown

1.61 (0.62, 3.98)

0.3195

Has subject ever worked with radiation in the army (apart from work in Chornobyl area)

Ever vs never + unknown

0.27 (0.03, 1.14)

0.0721

Other work with potential radiation exposure

Ever vs never + unknown

1.36 (0.22, 7.29)

0.7283

Radiotherapy for other reasons other than cancer

Ever vs never + unknown

1.73 (0.19, 8.07)

0.5740

Dental X-rays

Ever vs never + unknown

2.94 (0.09, 19.65)

0.4539

per X-ray

0.97 (0.85, 1.11)

0.6917a

Chest X-rays

Ever vs never + unknown

1.33 (0.82, 2.17)

0.2505

per X-ray

0.98 (0.90, 1.03)

0.4231a

Bone X-rays

Ever vs never + unknown

0.60 (0.37, 0.96)

0.0388

per X-ray

0.92 (0.75, 1.10)

0.3845a

X-rays other than dental, chest, bone

Ever vs never + unknown

2.94 (0.09, 19.89)

0.4539

per X-ray

1.15 (0.90, 1.45)

0.2853a

  1. All p-values relate to improvement in fit of the model with the specific variable added, adjusted for the set of background variables that minimize Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) (as in Appendix 1 Table 7) (with that variable omitted if already included in the optimal background model). Heterogeneity p-values and confidence intervals are adjusted for overdispersion
  2. a p-value of trend