Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Assessment of the potential respiratory hazard of volcanic ash from future Icelandic eruptions: a study of archived basaltic to rhyolitic ash samples

Environmental Health201716:98

Received: 10 May 2017

Accepted: 23 August 2017

Published: 11 September 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
10 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - G. Gudmundsson
8 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - David Damby
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
11 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12940-017-0302-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

US Geological Survey, Western Regional Offices, Menlo Park, USA
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
Institute of Hazard, Risk and Resilience, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK
Institute of Earth Sciences, Nordvulk, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
Dipartimento di Chimica, “G. Scansetti” Interdepartmental Center for Studies on Asbestos and other Toxic Particulates, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy
The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh/MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, Edinburgh, UK