Years | Areas | Lyon | Le Bugey | Le Havre |
---|---|---|---|---|
Calibration | ||||
1996 | wκ (95% CI) | 0.71 (0.67, 0.76) | 0.79 (0.73, 0.85) | 0.74 (0.68, 0.80) |
R2 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.68 | |
2002 | wκ (95% CI) | 0.84 (0.79, 0.88) | 0.82 (0.76, 0.87) | 0.77 (0.72, 0.83) |
R2 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.69 | |
2008 | wκ (95% CI) | 0.81 (0.72, 0.89) | 0.73 (0.66, 0.79) | 0.78 (0.72, 0.84) |
R2 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.84 | |
Performance evaluation 1: new virtual subjects randomly distributeda | ||||
1996 | wκ (95% CI) | 0.71 (0.64, 0.78) | 0.86 (0.81, 0.90) | 0.71 (0.64, 0.78) |
R2 | 0.95 | 0.86 | 0.30 | |
2002 | wκ (95% CI) | 0.67 (0.60, 0.74) | 0.86 (0.81, 0.91) | 0.74 (0.68, 0.80) |
R2 | 0.94 | 0.55 | 0.80 | |
2008 | wκ (95% CI) | 0.58 (0.49, 0.66) | 0.84 (0.79, 0.89) | 0.79 (0.73, 0.84) |
R2 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.62 | |
Performance evaluation 2: cadmium emissions | ||||
1996 | wκ (95% CI) | 0.69 (0.64, 0.73) | 0.83 (0.78, 0.87) | 0.72 (0.67, 0.78) |
R2 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.65 | |
2002 | wκ (95% CI) | 0.86 (0.82, 0.91) | 0.82 (0.77, 0.87) | 0.77 (0.71, 0.82) |
R2 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.66 | |
2008 | wκ (95% CI) | 0.73 (0.64, 0.83) | 0.69 (0.63, 0.76) | 0.74 (0.68, 0.80) |
R2 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.80 |