Skip to main content

Table 2 Examples of results from radiation epidemiological studies with and without adjusting for exposure estimation errors

From: Methods to account for uncertainties in exposure assessment in studies of environmental exposures

Studies

Exposure

Outcome

Error-correction Method

Measures of Association

Unadjusted risk effect with 95% confidence interval

Adjusted risk effect with 95% confidence interval

Percent change after adjustment

Little et al. (2015) [9]

131-I thyroid dose

Thyroid cancer

Regression Calibration

Excess odds ratio/Gy

1.51 (0.53, 3.86)

1.31 (0.47, 3.31)

−13%

MCML

Excess odds ratio/Gy

1.51 (0.53, 3.86)

1.48 (0.53, 3.87)

− 2%

BMA

Excess odds ratio/Gy

1.51 (0.53, 3.86)

1.16 (0.20,4.32) **

−23%

Land et al. (2015) [8]

External thyroid dose

Thyroid nodules

BMA

Excess relative risk/Gy

4.16 (0.54, 7.77)

1.47 (4.1E-05,3.74) **

−64%

Internal thyroid dose

BMA

Excess relative risk/Gy

0.88 (0.24, 1.52)

3.59 (0.11, 9.73) **

+ 308%

Kesminiene et al. (2008) [64]

Gamma-ray bone marrow dose

Hematological malignancies

MCML

Relative risk at 100 mGy

0.60 (− 0.02, 2.35)*

0.60 (− 0.01 2.58)*

0%

Stayner et al. (2007) [21]

Gamma-ray whole-body dose

All cancer mortality (excluding leukemia)

MCML

Excess relative risk/Sv

5.38 (0.54, 12.58)*

4.82 (0.41, 13.31)*

−10.4%

Allodji et al. (2015) [50]

Gamma-ray colon dose

Solid cancer deaths

Regression Calibration

Excess relative risk/Gy

0.43 (0.35, 0.51)

0.46 (0.38, 0.55)

+ 6.7%

SIMEX

Excess relative risk/Gy

0.43 (0.35, 0.51)

0.60 (0.50, 0.69)

+ 38.4%

Gamma-ray bone marrow dose

Leukemia deaths

Regression Calibration

Excess relative risk/Gy

3.86 (2.70, 5.02)

4.14 (2.90, 5.39)

+ 7.3%

SIMEX

Excess relative risk/Gy

3.86 (2.70, 5.02)

4.62 (3.30, 5.93)

+ 19.6%

  1. *90% Confidence interval
  2. **95% Bayesian credible interval