Applied measures to misinterprete science | |
---|---|
• Ghost-written research papers that assert glyphosate safety [35] | |
• Provided alternative interpretations of positive studies | |
• Used least statistically powerful tests on submitted research | |
• Developed a network of scientists to push glyphosate safety and attack IARC | |
• Used public relations teams and others to increase political activity and to attack the messenger (IARC, scientists, journalists, etc.) | |
• Provided EPA “talking points” about IARC classification | |
• Challenged two members of EPA’s SAP and one was removed | |
• Enlisted EPA to block ATSDR review of glyphosate that they were worried would agree with IARC. | |
• Drafted original Renewal Assessment Report for EFSA | |
• Exploited close relationships with journals, journalists and some regulatory staff |