Study Reference | Duration (months) | Strain | Dietary exposure dose levels (mg/kg/day) | Animals per Group | Purity (%) | Reason for exclusion | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mouse | Rat | ||||||
Reyna and Gordon (1973) [24] | 18 | SWMa | Â | M: 0, 17,50 F: 0, 17,50 | 50 | NPb | EPA [25] concluded this study was likely falsified |
Pavkov and Turner (1987) [26] | 24 | CD-1 | Â | M: 0, 11.7, 118, 991 F: 0, 11.7, 118, 991 | 50 | 56.2 | EPA [6] lists this study as completely negative for tumors but provides no tumor data. No tumor data is available for this study and the purity is low. |
Reyna and Gordon (1974) [27] | 24 | Â | SDc | Not available | 70 | 13.8 | EPA [25] concluded this study was likely falsified |
Burnett et al. (1979) [28] | 24 | Â | SDc | M: 0, 3.10.30 F: 0, 3,10,30 | 90 | NPb | EPA initially reported this as a glyphosate study [29] but later removed it because it is a study of a contaminant of glyphosate [6]. |
Pavkov and Wyand (1987) [30] | 24 |  | SDc | M: 0, 4.2, 21.2, 41.8 F: 0, 5.4, 27, 55.7 | 80–90 | 56.2 | EPA [6] lists this study as completely negative for tumors but provides very limited tumor data [31]. No tumor data is available for this study and the purity is low. |
Excel (1997) [32] | 24 | Â | SDc | M: 0, 150, 780, 1290 F: 0, 210, 1060, 1740 | 51 | NPb | No tumor data available, regulatory agencies had concerns about the quality of the study and purity of the material being studied |
Takahashi (1999b) [33] | 24 | Â | Fd | M: 0, 25, 201, 1750 F: 0, 29.7, 239, 2000 | 50 | NPb | This study is only mentioned by JMPR [7] and showed body weight changes at the highest exposure which probably exceeded the MTD. No tumor data were provided although JMPR concluded there is no increased carcinogenicity. |
Chruscielska (2000) [34] | 24 | Â | We | M: 1.9, 5.9, 17 F: 0, 2.2, 6.5, 19 | 85 | GBHf | Uncertainty in the material used in the study and poor reporting in the study. Note: this study is in drinking water |