Table 2 Comparison between protocols for personal RF-EMF exposure measurement studies.
|  | Röösli et al. [19] | This paper |
|---|---|---|
Measurement device(s) | PEM | UE with sensor (+PEM) |
Sample rate | 3 s | 0.25 ms |
Calibration | Device only | Device on body |
Level of analysis | Microenvironments | Activities |
Technologies | 2G – 4G | 2G – 5G |
e-BC exposure | Reduced measurement uncertainty | Reduced measurement uncertainty |
e-DL exposure (in 5G) | High measurement uncertainty | Reduced measurement uncertainty |
e-UL exposure | High measurement uncertainty | High measurement uncertainty |
a-DL exposure (only 5G) | High measurement uncertainty | Reduced measurement uncertainty |
a-UL exposure | High measurement uncertainty | Reduced measurement uncertainty |