Strategy | Explanation | Tobacco | Coal | Sugar | Syngenta | Marshall Institute & Others | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Attack Study Design | To emphasize study design flaws in Aϕ that have only minimal effects on outcomes. Flaws include issues related to bias, confounding, or sample size | X | X | X | X | X |
2 | Gain Support from Reputable Individuals | Recruit experts or influential people in certain fields (politicians, industry, journals, doctors, scientists, health officials) to defend BΔ in order to gain broader support | X | X | X | X | X |
3 | Misrepresent Data | Cherry-pick data, design studies to fail, or conduct meta-analyses to dilute the work of A | X | X | X | X | X |
4 | Suppress Incriminating Information | Hide information that runs counter to B | X | X | X | X | |
5 | Contribute Misleading Literature | Use literature published in journals or the media to deliberately misinform, either pro-B, anti-A, or to distract with peripheral topics | X | X | X | X | |
6 | Host Conferences or Seminars | Organize conferences for scientists or relevant stakeholders to provide a space for dissemination of only pro-B information | X | X | X | ||
7 | Avoid/Abuse Peer-Review | Avoid the peer-review process to publish poor literature, publish without revealing funding sources, use the journal name to add weight to claims, or minimize need for peer-review among lay audiences | X | X | X | ||
8 | Employ Hyperbolic or Absolutist Language | Discuss scientific findings in absolutist terms or with hyperbole, use buzzwords to differentiate between “strong” and “poor” science (i.e. sound science, junk science, etc.), | X | X | X | X | X |
9 | Blame Other Causes | Find related, alternative causes for negative effects that are reported or observed | X | X | X | X | |
10 | Invoke Liberties/Censorship/ Overregulation | Invoke laws to emphasize equality and rights for expression of B, despite differences in evidence quality | X | X | |||
11 | Define How to Measure Outcome/Exposure | Attempt to set guidelines for ‘proper’ measurement of exposures or outcomes, while undermining guidelines used in A | X | X | X | X | |
12 | Take Advantage of Scientific Illiteracy (media/individuals) | Emphasize scientific obscurity to confuse lay audiences, or deliberately disseminate unscientific or false but digestible information | X | X | X | X | |
13 | Pose as a Defender of Health or Truth | Represent the goals of B as health-conscious or dedicated to truth | X | X | X | X | |
14 | Obscure involvement | Ghostwrite, create shell companies, use attorney client privilege to hide association | X | X | X | ||
15 | Develop a PR Strategy | Devise methods for specifically reaching public audiences to spread B messages | X | X | X | ||
16 | Appeal to Mass Media | Appealing to journalistic balance, developing relationships with media personnel, preparing information for media personnel, invoking the Fairness Doctrine | X | X | X | ||
17 | Take Advantage of Victim’s Lack of Money/Influence | Silence or abuse individuals by out-spending or exploiting a power imbalance | X | X | |||
18 | Normalize Negative Outcomes | Normalize the presence of negative effects to reduce importance and make them seem inevitable | X | X | X | ||
19 | Impede Government Regulation | Overwhelm governmental regulatory agencies to slow or stop their function | X | X | |||
20 | Alter Product to Seem Healthier | Make modifications to harmful product to reduce ostensible negative effects | X | ||||
21 | Influence Government/Laws | Gain inappropriate proximity to regulatory bodies and encourage pro-B policy | X | X | X | X | X |
22 | Attack Opponents (scientifically/personally) | Conduct targeted attacks on opponents by undermining their professional or personal reputations | X | X | |||
23 | Appeal to Emotion | Manipulate an audiences’ emotions to draw support for claims in the absence of facts | X | X | |||
24 | Inappropriately Question Causality | Argue that correlation does not equal causation despite the presence of strong evidence | X | ||||
25 | Make Straw Man Arguments | Publicly refute an argument that was not made by the opposition | X | ||||
26 | Abuse Credentials | Use qualifications in one discipline to assume authority in another discipline | X | X | |||
27 | Abuse Data Access Requests | Requesting access to data in order to misrepresent and attack, employing Shelby Amendment, Freedom of Information Act, etc.. | X | X | |||
28 | Claim Slippery Slope | Illogically or falsely claiming that there will be disastrous consequences if B ideology is not supported | X | X |