Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinical trials of synthetic food dyes and neurobehavioral outcomes in children: summary of study results

From: Potential impacts of synthetic food dyes on activity and attention in children: a review of the human and animal evidence

 

Total

No associationa

Association identifiedb

Large effect sizeb

Statistically significantb

pc

Variable

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

All studies

25

9

36.0

16

64.0

3

12.0

13

52.0

 

Group resultsd

 Parent

14

7

50.0

7

50.0

1

7.1

6

42.9

Ref

 Teacher

7

6

85.7

1

14.3

0

0.0

1

14.3

0.11

 Other

14

9

64.3

5

35.7

2

14.3

3

21.4

0.45

Individual resultse

 Parent

12

3

25.0

9

75.0

4

33.3

5

41.7

Ref

 Teacher

2

1

50.0

1

50.0

1

50.0

0

0.0

0.12

 Other

5

1

20.0

4

80.0

3

60.0

1

20.0

0.91

Study qualityf

 Higher

12

4

33.3

8

66.7

2

16.7

6

50.0

Ref

 Lower

13

5

38.5

8

61.5

1

7.7

7

53.8

0.79

Publication year

 Before 1990

19

8

42.1

11

57.9

3

15.8

8

42.1

Ref

 1990 and later

6

1

16.7

5

83.3

0

0.0

5

83.3

0.26

Location

 United States

10

4

40.0

6

60.0

2

20.0

4

40.0

Ref

 Elsewhere

15

5

33.3

10

66.7

1

6.7

9

60.0

0.73

In hyperactive onlyg

 Yes

12

5

41.7

7

58.3

1

8.3

6

50.0

Ref

 No

13

4

30.8

9

69.2

2

15.4

7

53.8

0.57

Prior responders onlyh

 Yes

14

7

50.0

7

50.0

1

7.1

6

42.9

Ref

 No

11

2

18.2

9

81.8

2

18.2

7

63.6

0.10

No. of participants

  < 20

15

7

46.7

8

53.3

2

13.3

6

40.0

Ref

 20–100

7

1

14.3

6

85.7

1

14.3

5

71.4

0.14

  ≥ 100

3

1

33.3

2

66.7

0

0.0

2

66.7

0.67

RCDP

 Yes

16

6

37.5

10

62.5

2

12.5

8

50.0

Ref

 No

9

3

33.3

6

66.7

1

11.1

5

55.6

0.83

Challenge agents

 Multiple dyes

19

7

36.8

12

63.2

3

15.8

9

47.4

Ref

 Tartrazine only

6

2

33.3

4

66.7

0

0.0

4

66.7

0.88

Daily dose (mg)

  ≤ 10

4

2

50.0

2

50.0

0

0.0

2

50.0

Ref

 11–35

7

4

57.1

3

42.9

0

0.0

3

42.9

0.82

 36–99

8

2

25.0

6

75.0

2

25.0

4

50.0

0.39

  ≥ 100+

3

1

33.3

2

66.7

0

0.0

2

66.7

0.66

 Unclear

3

0

0.0

3

100.0

1

33.3

2

66.7

0.15

Washout > 2 days

 Yes

11

6

54.5

5

45.5

1

9.1

4

36.4

Ref

 No

14

3

21.4

11

78.6

2

14.3

9

64.3

0.09

Food dyes only

 Yes

22

9

40.9

13

59.1

3

13.6

10

45.5

Ref

 Additional agenti

3

0

0.0

3

100.0

0

0.0

3

100.0

0.17

Validated

 Yes

17

5

29.4

12

70.6

2

11.8

10

58.8

Ref

 No

8

4

50.0

4

50.0

1

12.5

3

37.5

0.32

Outcome timing

 Hourly

9

4

44.4

5

55.6

2

22.2

3

33.3

Ref

 Daily

6

0

0.0

6

100.0

0

0.0

6

100.0

0.06

 Several per week

3

1

33.3

2

66.7

1

33.3

1

33.3

0.74

 Weekly

3

1

33.3

2

66.7

0

0.0

2

66.7

0.74

 Greater than weekly

1

0

0.0

1

100.0

0

0.0

1

100.0

0.39

 Unclear

3

3

100.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0.09

Full results

 Yes

12

5

41.7

7

58.3

2

16.7

5

41.7

Ref

 No

13

4

30.8

9

69.2

1

7.7

8

61.5

0.57

Low infractionsj

 Yes

16

7

43.8

9

56.3

3

18.8

6

37.5

Ref

 No or unknown

9

2

22.2

7

77.8

0

0.0

7

77.8

0.28

  1. Abbreviations: RCDP, studies that are randomized crossover design, double blinded, and placebo controlled; Ref, reference category
  2. Only includes studies involving an active challenge i.e. diet elimination trials were not included in this table
  3. a Studies that did not report an association that was statistically significant, an effect size ≥20%, or standardized effect size ≥0.20
  4. b Studies that reported a statistically significant association, an effect size ≥20%, or standardized effect size ≥0.20. This category combines the studies listed under the “Large effect size” and “Statistically significant” columns. The “Statistically significant” column includes any study reporting a statistically significant association, regardless of effect size. The “Large effect size” column includes studies that reported an effect size ≥20% or a standardized effect size ≥0.20 but the results were not statistically significant
  5. c Chi-square p-value comparing proportion of studies finding no association (i.e. those in the “No association” column) to the proportion of studies finding an association (i.e. those in the “Association identified” column)
  6. d In studies that presented group means, provides results by the source of the outcome information (Parent, Teacher, or Other). The number of studies listed here is greater than the total number of studies since several studies presented results for more than one outcome source
  7. e In studies that presented results for individual participants, provides results by the source of the outcome information (Parent, Teacher, or Other). Several studies presented results for more than one outcome source
  8. f Divides studies by quality scores above (“Higher”) or below (“Lower”) the median score of 10
  9. g “Yes” if the study only included participants who were previously reported to have some condition related to hyperactivity
  10. h “Yes” if the study only included participants who were previously reported to have had some behavioral improvements on a synthetic food dye elimination diet
  11. i Typically a preservative like benzoic acid
  12. j “Yes” if the average number of dietary infractions was low (e.g., < 2 per week)