Skip to main content

Table 1 Chemicals grouping methods available to regulatory agencies in the US and the EU

From: Advancing the science on chemical classes

Agency

What was considered

Law

Legal requirement to group chemicals

Rationale for grouping

Grouping applied

Outcome

Reference

US CPSC

Organohalogen flame retardants

Federal Hazardous Substances Act

No

Same function (suppress fire); common chemical structure or predictive biological activity

No

CPSC has yet to agree on NAS grouping proposal

NAS 2019 [4]

US CPSC

Ortho-phthalates

Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act

Yes

Common adverse outcome due to anti-androgenic effects

Yes

Banned eight ortho-phthalates from children’s toys and articles

NAS 2008 [22]

US EPA

Pesticides

Food Quality Protection Act

Yes

Same toxic effect caused by same molecular mechanism of action

Yes

Conducted cumulative risk assessment for five classes of pesticides: organophosphates, N-methyl carbamates, triazines, chloroacetanilides, pyrethrins/pyrethroids

EPA [8]

US EPA

Industrial chemicals

Toxic Substances Control Act

No

Structural similarity; similar “physical, chemical, or biological properties;” similar use; similar exposure pathway

No

EPA has yet to identify classes

EPA [23]

US FDA

Food additives

Food Drug and Cosmetic Act

Yes

Structurally or toxicologically related

Yes

Banned uses of long-chain PFAS in food packaging

FDA [24]

US Washington State

Classes of chemicals in consumer products

Pollution Prevention for Healthy People and Puget Sound Act

Yes

Persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic or hazardous to children’s health

Yes

Regulates five classes of chemicals: PFAS, ortho-phthalates, OFR and other flame retardants identified in RCW 70.240.010, phenolic compounds, PCBs.

Department of Ecology [25]

US Washington State

Per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS)

Packages containing metals

Yes

Persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic

Yes

PFAS banned from use in fiber-based products in contact with food

Department of Ecology [26]

US State of Maine

Chemicals in food packaging and packaging components

Reduction in Toxic Packaging

Yes

Persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic; or hazardous to children’s health

Yes

Bans PFAS and ortho-phthalates

Department of Environmental Protection [27]

US State of California

Chemicals in consumer products

Safer Consumer Products Regulations

No

Persistence

Yes

PFAS

Department of Toxic Substances Control [28]

EU EFSA

Food flavouring substances

Flavouring substances

Yes

Structural similarity

Yes

Regulates flavors across 34 groups

EFSA [299]

EU EFSA

Pesticides

Pesticides

Yes

Common toxic effects

Yes

Cumulative risk assessment; identified two groups: affecting the nervous system and the thyroid system

EFSA [30]

EU ECHA

Industrial chemicals

REACH

Yes

Structural similarity

Yes

Read-across

ECHA [30]

Health Canada

Industrial chemicals

 

Yes

Structural similarity

Yes

Prioritization of nine groups: aromatic azo- and benzidine-based substances; substituted diphenylamines; cobalt-containing substances; methylenediphenyl diisocyanates and diamines (MDI/MDA); certain internationally classified substances with potential for exposure to individuals in Canada; selenium-containing substances; certain organic flame retardants; ortho-phthalates; and boron-containing substances.

Health Canada [31]