Skip to main content

Table 7 Individual study and pooled bias-adjusted effect estimates comparing diesel exposed versus non-exposed and their 95% C.I.'s.

From: Risk assessment of diesel exhaust and lung cancer: combining human and animal studies after adjustment for biases in epidemiological studies

Study

Bias Adjusted Estimate

95% C.I.

Human studies

  

Garshick et al. [18]

1.24

1.16 - 1.31

Wellmann et al. [19]

1.88

1.57 - 2.19

Gustavsson et al. [20]

1.76

1.15 - 2.37

Pooled

Fixeda

1.279

1.207 - 1.351

 

Random

1.594

1.086 - 2.101

 

Random without bias adjustment

1.727

1.218 - 2.236

Animal studies

  

Nikula et al. [31]

1.43

0.95 - 1.90

Brightwell et al. [29]

1.25

0.83 - 1.67

Mauderly et al. [32]

1.58

0.84 - 2.31

Pooled

Fixed

1.365

1.075 - 1.654

 

Random

1.365

1.075 - 1.654

All studies (pooled estimate)

  

Fixeda

1.284

1.215 - 1.354

Random

1.492

1.210 - 1.775

Random without bias adjustment

1.586

1.279 - 1.892

  1. a significant heterogeneity