Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
7 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harvey Checkoway |
13 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Stern |
18 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shelia Zahm |
10 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Afroditi Veloudaki |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Afroditi Veloudaki |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
11 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shelia Zahm |
22 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Stern |
11 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harvey Checkoway |
14 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Afroditi Veloudaki |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Afroditi Veloudaki |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
3 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
19 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Afroditi Veloudaki |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
19 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
24 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
24 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-10-50 |
You can find further information about peer review here.