Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Jagals |
| 2 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patricia Newcomb |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 26 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patricia Newcomb |
| 27 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angus Cook |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 10 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Jagals |
| 24 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angus Cook |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 24 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 26 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Angus Cook |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 26 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 2 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-10-52 |
You can find further information about peer review here.