Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 31 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Barbara Cohn |
| 8 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Greet Schoeters |
| 25 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helen Håkansson |
| 21 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eva Cecilie Bonefeld-Jorgensen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helen Håkansson |
| 9 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Barbara Cohn |
| 16 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Greet Schoeters |
| 22 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eva Cecilie Bonefeld-Jorgensen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 22 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 3 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Eva Cecilie Bonefeld-Jorgensen |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 3 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-10-88 |
You can find further information about peer review here.