Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Doug Brugge |
| 18 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Sandel |
| 23 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Keall |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 23 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 2 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Doug Brugge |
| 20 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Keall |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 20 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 14 May 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 May 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-11-33 |
You can find further information about peer review here.