Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics and methods used in the evaluated meta-analysis papers

From: Environmental risk factors of pregnancy outcomes: a summary of recent meta-analyses of epidemiological studies

Study

N studies included

N subjects

Databases

Followed guidelines MOOSE

Quality rating

Cochran Q

I2

Random/fixed

Funnel plot

Egger test

Blegg’s

Sensitity analyses

Environmental tobacco smoke

            

Leonardi-Bee et al. 2008 [18]

58

 

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS

yes

yes

 

yes

Random

   

yes

Salamasi et al. 2010 [19]

76

139 K

Medline, EMBASE, reference lists

yes

yes

 

yes

Random

yes

  

yes

Leonardi-Bee et al. 2011 [20]

19

 

MEDLINE, EMBASE

yes

yes

 

yes

Random

yes

  

yes

Outdoor air pollution

            

Sapkota et al. 2010 [16]

20

Up to 1.9 M

ISI Web of Knowledge, PubMed

  

yes

yes

both

 

yes

yes

yes

Vrijheid et 2011 [21]

10

Up to 5.4 M

MEDLINE ISI Web of Science

  

yes

 

both

 

yes

 

yes

Indoor air pollution

            

Pope et al. 2010 [22]

8/4

18 K/34 K

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literaturee, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Information System, System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe, Index to Conference Proceedings, PASCAL

 

yes

yes

yes

both

yes

yes

yes

yes

Water contaminants

            

Hwang et al. 2008 [23]

6

Up to 3.3 M

PubMed

  

yes

 

both

   

yes

Nieuwenhuijsen et al. 2009 [24]

15

Up to 3.6 M

PubMed Review articles

  

yes

 

both

yes

yes

 

yes

Grellier et al. 2010 [25]

15

Up to 1.6 M

MEDLINE

yes

no

yes

 

both

yes

yes

 

yes

Nieuwenhuijsen et al. 2010 [17]

5

 

MEDLINE

         

POPs/PCB

            

Govarts et al. 2012 [26]

12

8 K

European birth cohorts http://www.enrieco.org

  

yes

 

both

   

yes

Occupation

            

Logman et al. 2005 [27]

6

384 K

MEDLINE Toxline, Reprotox, EMBASE

 

yes

yes

 

both

yes

yes

  

Romitti et al. 2007 [28]

7/5

3.5 K/64 K

MEDLINE

    

Random

   

yes

Rocheleau et al. 2009 [29]

9

376 K

PubMed

    

Random

   

yes

Pesticides

            

Ngo et al. 2006 [30]

22

196 K

MEDLINE, EMBASE

  

yes

yes

both

yes

yes

 

yes

Ngo et al. 2010 [31]

7

135 K

MEDLINE, EMBASE

 

no

yes

yes

both

yes

yes

 

yes