Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Neela Guha |
2 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kenneth Cantor |
3 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margaret Karagas |
16 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Saint-Jacques |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
30 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Neela Guha |
4 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kenneth Cantor |
13 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margaret Karagas |
5 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Saint-Jacques |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
5 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
6 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margaret Karagas |
20 Jan 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Saint-Jacques |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
20 Jan 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
20 Feb 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margaret Karagas |
3 Mar 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Saint-Jacques |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
3 Mar 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
5 Mar 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
2 Jun 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-13-44 |
You can find further information about peer review here.