From: Dealing with uncertainties in environmental burden of disease assessment
Uncertainty characterizations | Categories | |
---|---|---|
Location: the location at which the uncertainty manifests itself in the assessment | Model structure: Structure and form of the relationships between the variables that describe the system | |
 | Parameters: Constants in functions that define the relationships between variables (such as relative risks or severity weights) | |
 | Input data: Input data sets (such as concentrations, demographic data, and incidence data) | |
Nature: the underlying cause of the uncertainty | Epistemic: resulting from incomplete knowledge | |
 | Ontic | Process variability: resulting from natural and social variability in the system |
 |  | Normative uncertainty: resulting from a plurality of socio-ethico-normative considerations within a society |
Range: expression of the uncertainty | Statistical (range + chance): specified probabilities and specified outcomes | |
 | Scenario (range + "what if"): specified outcomes, but unspecified probabilities | |
Recognized ignorance: unknown outcomes, unknown probabilities – uncertainties are present, but no useful estimate can be given | ||
Methodological unreliability: Methodological quality of all different elements of the assessment; a qualitative judgment of the assessment process which can based on e.g. its theoretical foundation, empirical basis, reproducibility and acceptance within the peer community | ||
Value diversity among analysts: Potential value-ladenness of assumptions which inevitably involve – to some degree – arbitrary judgments by the analysts. |