From: Dealing with uncertainties in environmental burden of disease assessment
Source of uncertainty | Nature Epistemic/Ontic (Process Variability/Normative Uncertainty) | Range Statistical/Scenario | Recognized ignorance | Methodological unreliability | Value diversity among analysts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CONTEXTUAL UNCERTAINTY | ||||||
1 | Multiple ways of defining the 'total environment' | E/Nor | Sc | - | + | ++ |
2 | Only including diseases that cause at least 1% of the global burden of disease | Nor | Sc | -- | -- | + |
MODEL STRUCTURE UNCERTAINTY | ||||||
3 | Specific form of the exposure-response relationship is unknown | E | Sc | + | + | + |
4 | Evidence for causality (environmental factor leading to health effect) is weak and contradicting | E | Sc | ++ | ++ | + |
5 | Incomplete understanding of the joint effect of smoking and radon in relation to lung cancer | E | Sc | + | + | + |
6 | Accounting for susceptible groups if the available relative risk is not representative for this group | Pro/E | St | + | + | + |
PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY | ||||||
7 | Determining a relative risk (RR) for long-term exposure to PM10 | E | St | + | + | - |
8 | Applying an American RR for PM10 to the Netherlands | E | Sc | ++ | + | + |
9 | Use of severity weights | Nor/E | Sc | + | + | ++ |
INPUT DATA UNCERTAINTY | ||||||
10 | Extrapolating non-assessment-specific exposure measurements | E | Sc | ++ | + | + |
11 | Measuring population exposure | E | St | + | + | - |