Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luc Louis Rosa Int Panis |
26 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anne Lusk |
29 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Russell Lopez |
3 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jennifer Dill |
14 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Conor Reynolds |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
17 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anne Lusk |
19 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Conor Reynolds |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
19 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Conor Reynolds |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
30 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Conor Reynolds |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
16 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Conor Reynolds |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
16 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
21 Oct 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Oct 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-8-47 |
You can find further information about peer review here.