Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
3 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Richardson |
30 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Duncan Thomas |
6 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Greg Dropkin |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
7 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Greg Dropkin |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
7 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
9 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Duncan Thomas |
3 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Greg Dropkin |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Greg Dropkin |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
3 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
17 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Greg Dropkin |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
17 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
26 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Greg Dropkin |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
26 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
9 Dec 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
9 Dec 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-8-56 |
You can find further information about peer review here.