Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Courtney Sulentic |
5 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francisco Quintana |
22 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - David Sherr |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Courtney Sulentic |
4 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Sherr |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
4 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
17 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Courtney Sulentic |
2 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Sherr |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Sherr |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
19 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - David Sherr |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
19 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
24 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-9-15 |
You can find further information about peer review here.