Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of methods for calculating the health costs of endocrine disrupters: a case study on triclosan

Original Submission
24 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
2 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Radka Prichystalova
28 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Douglas Crawford-Brown
28 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ingrid Rijk
Resubmission - Version 2
2 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Douglas Crawford-Brown
25 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ingrid Rijk
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
26 May 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12940-017-0265-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page