Skip to main content

Table 3 Statistical comparison of the profiles of limitations between studies with positive and negative results

From: Methodological limitations in experimental studies on symptom development in individuals with idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF) – a systematic review

 

Risk of bias

Imprecision

Total number of key questions judged to be at high risk of bias

Number of key questions judged to be at high risk of bias in favour of a null result

Number of key questions judged to be at high risk of bias with uncertain direction on study outcome

Studies with key question judged to be at high risk of bias in favour of an effect of exposure

Studies judged to have concern regarding statistical power

Studies judged to have concern regarding missing adjustment for multiple comparisons when relevant

Median (Interquartile range)

Median (Interquartile range)

Median (Interquartile range)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Studies with positive results

3.0 (4.0)

2.0 (4.0)

1.0 (2.0)

2 (29%)

6 (86%)

2 (29%)

Studies with negative results

2.0 (2.0)

2.0 (1.5)

0 (1.5)

5 (26%)

15 (71%)

10 (48%)

Test statistics and p-values

Mann-Whitney-U:

U = 55.5

p = 0.351,4

Mann-Whitney-U: U = 65.0

p = 0.682,4

Mann-Whitney-U: U = 54.5

p = 0.322,4

Fisher’s exact: p = 1.002

Fisher’s exact: p = 0.643

Fisher’s exact: p = 0.663

  1. Significance levels: 1α = 0.05, 2α = 0.017, 3α = 0.025
  2. 4Exact significance