Skip to main content

Table 3 Complete list of interventions evaluated by effectiveness, cost, feasibility and sustainability

From: Sustainable solutions to mitigate occupational heat strain – an umbrella review of physiological effects and global health perspectives

Intervention

Strength of evidence

Effectiveness (best/ (worst) scenario)

Cost (considering acquisition and operation)

Feasibility (indoor/ small spaces

Feasibility (outdoor/ open spaces)

Environmental impact (ecological foot print)

Environmental conditioning

 Air conditioning

2

3.0 / (0.75)

HIGH

−0.8

−2.9

HIGH

 Misting fan

2

2.5 / (1.4)

MOD

−1

−1.8

MOD

 Fanning

3

2.4 / (1.2)

MOD

−0.8

−1.9

MOD

 Shading

1

2.3 / (0.6)

LOW

−0.7

−1.3

LOW

Clothing

 Air cooled garments

3

3.0 / (2.3)

HIGH

−2

− 2.6

HIGH

 Liquid cooled garments

3

3.0 / (2.3)

HIGH

−2.3

−3

HIGH

 Cooling vest

3

1.7 / (1.7)

MOD

−1.3

−2

MOD

 Elevated design clothing

1

1.2 / (1.2)

MOD

−1.4

− 1.7

MOD

 Ventilator-incorporated clothing

1

1.1 / (1.1)

MOD

−1.8

− 1.8

MOD

 Compression garments

3

1.0 / (0.8)

MOD

−1.3

−1.6

LOW

 Protective clothing

2

0.7 / (0.6)

MOD

−1.6

− 1.7

LOW

Innate conditioning

 Short term HA

3

1.9 / (1.8)

NONE

−1.7

−1

NONE

 Medium term HA

3

2.5 / (2.4)

NONE

−1.4

−0.9

NONE

 Long term HA

3

2.9 / (2.6)

NONE

−1.6

− 1.1

NONE

 Aerobic fitness

3

2.9 / (2.1)

NONE

−1.2

−1.0

NONE

Personal cooling solutions

 Cold water immersion

3

2.2 / (1.9)

MOD

−1.6

−1.9

LOW

 Intravenous cooling

2

2.3 / (1.7)

HIGH

−2.3

−2.6

MOD

 Cold air inhalation

2

2.1 / (1.2)

HIGH

−2.1

−2.5

MOD

 Cold fluid ingestion

3

2.0 / (1.7)

MOD

−1.3

−1.5

LOW

 Cooling packs

3

1.8 / (1.5)

MOD

−1.6

−2.1

MOD

 Skin wetting

3

1.7 / (1.4)

LOW

−1.9

−1.6

LOW

 Neck/head cooling

3

1.2 / (1.1)

MOD

−1.7

− 1.5

LOW

 Ice towels

2

1.5 / (1.3)

MOD

−2.2

−1.9

LOW

 Cooling glove

2

0.8 / (0.6)

MOD

−1.8

−2.2

MOD

 External menthol use

3

0.7 / (0.3)

LOW

−2

−1.9

LOW

 CInternal menthol use

3

0.7 / (0.3)

LOW

−1.8

− 1.7

LOW

Pacing

 Change in work schedule

0

2.0 / (1.5)

NONE

−1.5

−1.6

NONE

 Work intensity reduction

1

1.8 / (1.8)

NONE

−1

−1.1

NONE

 Breaks

1

1.3 / (1.3)

NONE

−1

−1.1

NONE

Hydration and nutrition

 Hydration

3

2.0 / (2.0)

LOW

−1

−0.9

NONE

 Electrolyte consumption

1

1.2 / (0.9)

LOW

−0.7

−0.6

NONE

 Carbohydrate ingestion

2

0.6 / (0.6)

LOW

−0.7

−0.6

LOW

 Protein ingestion

2

0.3 / (0.3)

LOW

−0.7

− 0.6

LOW

  1. Table 3 is a summary table of all the identified available solutions to mitigate occupational heat strain, which have been evaluated on four-point scales for five different criteria: the strength of evidence in the literature, the proven effectiveness of the method in best (bolded numbers) and worst case (numbers in parentheses) scenarios, the cost, the feasibility (separated into indoors and outdoors) and the environmental impact. Scores for strength of evidence were: 0, expert knowledge or non-human based research; 1, original research; 2, systematically reviewed but not meta-analysed; and 3, systematically reviewed and meta-analysed. Effectiveness scores were: 0, ineffective or detrimental; 1, slightly beneficial; 2, moderately beneficial; and 3, beneficial. Cost evaluations were: none, low, moderate (MOD) and high. Feasibility scores were: 0, no disruptions to normal work; − 1, minor interruptions; −2, moderate interruptions; and − 3, major interruptions. Environmental impact scores were: none, low, moderate (MOD) and high.