Skip to main content

Table 1 A series of 10 scenarios compared in a risk assessment study of the impact of atmospheric pollution (fine particulate matter, or PM2.5). From [40]

From: The methodology of quantitative risk assessment studies

Scenario number

Scenario description

Scenario name

PM2.5 yearly level reduction

S1

Spatially homogeneous target value in the whole area

“WHO guideline”

Down to WHO yearly guideline (10 µg/m3 at the time of this publication)

S2

“No anthropogenic PM2.5 emissions”

Down to lowest nation-wide levels (4.9 µg/m3)a

S3

“Quiet neighborhood”

Down to lowest study area district levels (10th percentile of exposure)b

S4

Homogeneous PM2.5 decreases in the whole area

“-1 µg/m3

Baselinec -1 µg/m3

S5

“-2 µg/m3

Baselinec -2 µg/m3

S6

Targeted reduction in PM2.5-related mortality in the whole aread

“-1/3 of mortality”

Equivalent to decreasing homogeneously and sufficiently the baselinec exposure to achieve the indicated health objectivee

S7

“-1/2 of mortality”

S8

“-2/3 of mortality”

S9

2008/50/EU Directivef

“2020 target”

In the whole study area”

Baselinec -15%

S10

Restricted to PM2.5 exposure hotspots”

Baselinec -15%, only if baseline ≥ 90th centile of PM2.5 levelsg

  1. aCorresponding to the 5th percentile of PM2.5 concentration distribution among French rural towns
  2. bThe 10th percentile of PM2.5 exposure by Housing Block Regrouped for Statistical Information (IRIS) in the study area (corresponding to 10.3 and 12.4 µg/m3 in Grenoble and Lyon conurbations, respectively)
  3. cBaseline corresponds to the PM2.5 exposure average for the 2015–2017 period, taken as a reference in the present study
  4. dMortality reduction targets expressed as a proportion of the non-accidental death cases attributable to PM2.5 exposure that can be prevented under the scenario S2: “No anthropogenic PM2.5 emissions”
  5. eS6: -2.9 and -3.3 µg/m3 in Grenoble and Lyon conurbations, respectively; S7: -4.4 and -5.1 µg/m3; S8: -6.0 and -6.9 µg/m3
  6. fInspired by the 2008/50/EU Directive, which targets relative PM2.5 yearly average decreases to obtain by 2020. The decrease value depends on the exposure average for the last three years (2015–2017): -15% in the case of Grenoble and Lyon conurbations
  7. gThe 90th percentile corresponded to 16.0 and 17.4 µg/m3 in Grenoble and Lyon conurbations, respectively